Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A quantitative dendritic analysis of wernicke's area in humans. II. Gender, hemispheric, and environmental factors

Jacobs, Bob, Schall, Matthew, Scheibel, Arnold B.·1993·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

This quantitative Golgi study extends our investigation of relationships between cortical dendrite systems in humans and higher cognitive functions. Here we examine the relationship between the basilar dendrites of supragranular pyramidal cells in Wernicke's area and selected intrinsic (i.e., gender and hemisphere) and extrinsic (i.e., education and personal history) variables. Tissue was obtained from 20 neurologically normal right‐handers: 10 males (M age = 52.2) and 10 females (M age = 47.8). Several independent variables were investigated: GENDER (male, female), HEMISPHERE (left, right), and EDUCATION (less than high school, high school, and university). These were evaluated according to Total Dendritic Length, Mean Dendritic Length, and Dendritic Segment Count. A distinction was made between proximal (1st, 2nd, and 3rd order) and ontogenetically later developing distal (4th order and above) branches. There was significant interindividual variation in dendritic measurements, which roughly reflected individuals' personal backgrounds. Females exhibited slightly greater dendritic values and variability than males across the age range examined. On the whole, the left hemisphere maintained a slight advantage over the right hemisphere for all dendritic measures when all subjects were pooled, but these differences were not in a consistent direction across individuals. Education had a consistent and substantial effect such that dendritic measures increased as educational levels increased. Dendritic differences between independent variable levels were most clearly illustrated in the total dendritic length of 3rd and 4th order branches. Distal dendritic branches appeared to exhibit greater epigenetic flexibility than proximal dendrites. The present findings concur with environmental enrichment research results in animals and suggest that dendritic systems in humans function as a sensitive indicator of an individual's (a)vocational activities. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903270108

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jacobs, B., Schall, M., & Scheibel, A. B.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-01
Volume
327
Issue
1
Pages
97-111
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2095878357
Cited by
303
References
8
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.