Cited by 146Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Neuroprotective effects of cognitive enrichment

Milgram, Norton W., Siwak-Tapp, Christina T., Araujo, Joseph, Head, Elizabeth·2006·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Cognitive enrichment early in life, as indicated by level of education, complexity of work environment or nature of leisure activities, appears to protect against the development of age-associated cognitive decline and also dementia. These effects are more robust for measures of crystallized intelligence than for measures of fluid intelligence and depend on the ability of the brain to compensate for pathological changes associated with aging. This compensatory ability is referred to as cognitive reserve. The cognitive reserve hypothesis suggests that cognitive enrichment promotes utilization of available functions. Alternatively, late life cognitive changes in cognition may be linked to a factor, such as cholinergic dysfunction, that is also present early in life and contributes to the reduced levels of early life cognitive enrichment. Beneficial effects of environmental enrichment early in life have also been observed in rodents and primates. Research with rodents indicates that these changes have structural correlates, which likely include increased synapses in specific brain regions. Dogs also show age-dependent cognitive decline, and both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies indicate that this decline can be attenuated by cognitive enrichment. Furthermore, cognitive enrichment has differential effects, improving some functions more than others. From a neurobiological perspective, behavioral enrichment in the dog may act to promote neurogenesis later in life. This can be distinguished from nutritional interventions with antioxidants, which appear to attenuate the development of neuropathology. These results suggest that a combination of behavioral and nutritional or pharmacological interventions may be optimal for reducing the rate of age-dependent cognitive decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2006.04.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milgram, N. W., Siwak-Tapp, C. T., Araujo, J., & Head, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Milgram, Norton W.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
354-369
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052300068
Cited by
146
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Natural Sciences
  • National Institute on Aging (AG12694)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
cognitive enrichment, cognitive reserve, age-related cognitive decline, dementia prevention, crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, cholinergic dysfunction, environmental enrichment, behavioral enrichment, dogs, neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, antioxidants, dietary intervention, work environment, leisure
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Humans, Intelligence, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review