Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careCancer Risks and FactorsWomen's cancer prevention and management

Acceptability of a structured diet and exercise weight loss intervention in breast cancer survivors living with an overweight condition or obesity: A qualitative analysis

Open access
Beckenstein, Hailee, Slim, May, Kim, Helene, Plourde, Hugues, Kilgour, Robert, Cohen, Tamara R.·2021·Cancer Reports

Abstract

Background: Weight loss increases survivorship following breast cancer diagnosis. However, most breast cancer survivors (BCS) do not meet diet and exercise recommendations. Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators of BCS who had lymphedema and who participated in a 22‐week weight loss lifestyle intervention. Methods and results: Participants completed semi‐structured interviews about barriers and facilitators to intervention adherence. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was conducted. Participants (n = 17) were 62 ± 8.0 years of age with a mean body mass index of 34.0 ± 7.1 kg/m 2. Four themes emerged: (1) facilitators of intervention adherence, (2) barriers of intervention adherence, (3) continuation of healthy habits post intervention, and (4) recommendations for intervention improvements. Facilitators of intervention adherence were education, social support, routine, motivation, goal‐setting, meal‐provisioning, self‐awareness, and supervised exercise. Barriers to intervention adherence were personal life, health, meal dissatisfaction, seasonality, unchallenging exercises, and exercising alone. All women planned to continue the acquired healthy habits post intervention. Recommendations to improve the study included addressing the exercise regime, meal‐provisioning, and dietary intake monitoring methods. Conclusion: Future strategies to engage BCS in weight loss interventions should promote group exercise, offer individualized meal‐provisioning and exercise regimes, provide transition tools, and allow participants to choose their self‐monitoring method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cnr2.1337

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsidizing or covering external costs associated with behaviour change (e.g., healthy food, gym memberships, physical activity equipment) has proven beneficial for compliance and improvement of intervention outcomes in low sodium diet and activity interventions.

    “This has proven to be beneficial for compliance and consequently in improvement of intervention outcomes in low sodium diet [78–82] and activity interventions [83].”

    From Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Methods report that participants received a three-month gym membership, and Theme 3 says many were grateful for it as a way to continue physical activity. The Discussion suggests the membership may explain participants’ intentions to keep exercising, but this qualitative study does not demonstrate that covering costs improved compliance or intervention outcomes. It does not assess physical activity equipment costs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Lunenburg FC. Goal‐setting theory of motivation. Int J Manag Bus Adm. 2011; 15(1): 1‐ 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beckenstein, H., Slim, M., Kim, H., Plourde, H., Kilgour, R., & Cohen, T. R.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Tamara R.
Venue
Cancer Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-25
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e1337-e1337
ISSN
2573-8348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122710440
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, weight loss interventions, obesity, overweight, lymphedema, diet and exercise adherence, barriers and facilitators, social support, supervised exercise, self-monitoring, treatment acceptability
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Cancer Survivors, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Qualitative Research, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review