Cited by 20Education and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental Health

The influence of psychosocial factors in veteran adjustment to civilian life

Bowes, Margaret A., Ferreira, Nuno, Henderson, Mike·2018·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Aim: Although most veterans have a successful transition to civilian life when they leave the military, some struggle to cope and adjust to the demands and challenges of civilian life. This study explores how a variety of psychosocial factors influence veteran adjustment to civilian life in Scotland, UK, and which of these factors predict a poor adjustment. Methods: One hundred and fifty‐four veterans across Scotland completed a set of questionnaires that measured veteran adjustment difficulty, quality of life, mental health, stigma, self‐stigma, attitude towards help‐seeking, likelihood of help‐seeking, experiential avoidance, reappraisal and suppression. Results: Veteran adjustment difficulty and quality of life were significantly correlated to a number of psychosocial factors. Mental health, experiential avoidance and cognitive reappraisal were found to be predictors of veteran adjustment difficulty, and experiential avoidance and cognitive reappraisal partially mediated the relationship between mental health and veteran adjustment, with experiential avoidance being the stronger mediator. Discussion: Our findings suggest that early assessment of experiential avoidance and cognitive reappraisal and the provision of relevant emotion regulation skills training could potentially reduce the veteran's need for more complex (and costly) psychological interventions in the future. Implications for veterans, as well as the services and professionals involved with veteran transition and health care are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2182

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowes, M. A., Ferreira, N., & Henderson, M.
Affiliations
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • University of Nicosia (CY)
  • Clinical Psychology NHS Borders Scotland UK
Corresponding author
Bowes, Margaret A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-25
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
583-600
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2793975984
Cited by
20
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
veterans, transition to civilian life, psychosocial factors, mental health, experiential avoidance, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, self-stigma, help-seeking attitudes, quality of life, stigma, Scotland
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scotland, Veterans, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review