Cited by 3COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Path analysis from COVID‐19 perceptions to psychological health: The roles of critical distance and mastery

Open access
Faustino, Bruno, Vasco, António Branco, Farinha‐Fernandes, António, Delgado, João, Guerreiro, José Carlos, Matos, Marta·2022·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Objective: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic was previously associated with psychopathological symptoms. However, the psychological mechanisms underlying these associations are largely unexplored. Previous studies suggested associations between metacognitive abilities (e.g., mastery) and symptomatology, which may have impacts on COVID‐19 perceptions. This study aims to explore, using path analysis, the mediational role of Critical Distance (differentiation and decentration abilities) and Mastery on the relationships between COVID‐19 perceptions and psychological well‐being and distress. Methods: In a cross‐sectional design, 227 participants (M = 34.21, SD = 10.9) filled self‐report questionnaires. Results: Metacognitive abilities were negatively correlated with psychopathological symptoms. Both Critical Distance and Mastery mediated the path from COVID‐19 perceived severity and anxiety to psychological distress and well‐being. Critical Distance seems to augment Mastery which tends to increase psychological well‐being and limited psychological distress. Conclusions: Metacognition seems to play a mediational role on the relationship between COVID‐19 perceptions and mental health. Clinical psychologists and psychotherapists may enhance psychological interventions regarding COVID‐19 psychopathological symptomatology by working on metacognitive Critical Distance and Mastery abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2736

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Canavarro, M. C. (1999). Inventário de sintomas psicopatol ogicos -BSI. In M. R. Simões, M. Gonçalves, & L. S. Almeida (Eds.), Testes e Provas Psicol ogicas em Portugal (Vol. II, pp. 95-109). APPORT/SHO.
  2. Pedone, R., Semerari, A., Riccardi, I., Procacci, M., Nicolò, G., & Carcione, A. (2017). Development of a self-report measure of metacognition: The Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS). Instrument description and factor structure. Clinical. Neuropsychiatry, 14(3), 185-194.
  3. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy. Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faustino, B., Vasco, A. B., Farinha‐Fernandes, A., Delgado, J., Guerreiro, J. C., & Matos, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Faustino, Bruno
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-11
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
1707-1716
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W4220892683
Cited by
3
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
public perception of COVID-19, critical distance, mastery, metacognition, psychological distress, psychological well-being, anxiety, perceived severity, mediation, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
Metacognition, COVID-19, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review