Cited by 112Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Preliminary validation of an ultra‐brief version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

Berle, David, Starcevic, Vladan, Moses, Karen, Hannan, Anthony, Milicevic, Denise, Sammut, Peter·2011·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is widely regarded as the gold standard self‐report questionnaire for pathological worry. However, the factorial structure of the scale remains contentious. We sought to determine whether a psychometrically sound brief version of the PSWQ, which avoids contentious items and yet incorporates the essential features of pathological worry, could be derived from the existing PSWQ item pool. After inspecting items of the PSWQ and the findings of previous factor analytic studies, three items were selected that capture the essence of pathological worry (i.e., high frequency, perceived uncontrollability and multiple domains of worry), according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). We then compared the psychometric properties of the 3‐item PSWQ with the full PSWQ in a sample of 225 clients attending an anxiety disorders clinic. Despite its brevity, the 3‐item PSWQ had internal consistency comparable with that of the standard PSWQ, and performed equally well with regards to convergent and discriminant validity, in screening for a generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis and in detecting change with treatment. The 3‐item ultra‐brief version of the PSWQ is quick to administer, simple to score and possesses psychometric properties very similar to the 16‐item version. Further research should confirm the psychometric properties of the 3‐item version when administered independently of the other items and assess the scale's test–retest reliability. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: • The 3‐item version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) captures the essence of pathological worry, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders (Fourth Edition). • The 3‐item version of the PSWQ appears to have similar psychometric properties to the full, 16‐item version, and is therefore a good measure of pathological worry. • The 3‐item PSWQ is quick to administer in time‐pressured clinical settings. • The 3‐item PSWQ is simple to score and does not include reverse‐keyed items.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.724

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berle, D., Starcevic, V., Moses, K., Hannan, A., Milicevic, D., & Sammut, P.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • Nepean Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Berle, David
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-30
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
339-346
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1970856681
Cited by
112
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Penn State Worry Questionnaire, pathological worry, generalized anxiety disorder, scale validation, psychometric properties, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review