The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Design of Ag‐Based Catalysts for the Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to CO: A Review
Abstract
The selective electrochemical CO 2 reduction (ECR) to CO in aqueous electrolytes has gained significant interest in recent years due to its capability to mitigate the environmental issues associated with CO 2 emission and to convert renewable energy such as wind and solar power into chemical energy as well as its potential to realize the commercial use of CO 2. In view of the thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness of CO 2 molecules, the exploitation of active, selective, and stable catalysts for the ECR to CO is crucial to promote the reaction efficiency. Indeed, plenty of electrocatalysts for the selective ECR to CO have been explored, of which Ag is known as the most promising electrocatalyst for large‐scale ECR to CO due to several competitive advantages including high catalytic performance, low price, and rich reserves compared with other metal counterparts. To provide useful guidelines for the further development of efficient catalysts for the ECR to CO, a comprehensive summary of the recent progress of Ag‐based electrocatalysts is presented in this Review. Different modification strategies of Ag‐based electrocatalysts are highlighted, including exposure of crystal facets, tuning of morphology and size, introduction of support materials, alloying with other metals, and surface modification with functional groups. The reaction mechanisms involved in these different modification strategies of Ag‐based electrocatalysts are also discussed. Finally, the prospects for the development of next‐generation Ag‐based electrocatalysts are proposed in an effort to facilitate the industrialization of ECR to CO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO 2 Fixation
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300463y · Cited by 2,193
Hori, Y., Wakebe, H., Tsukamoto, T., & Koga, O. (1994) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(94)85172-7 · Cited by 2,140
Enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction via field-induced reagent concentration
Liu, M., Pang, Y., Zhang, B., De Luna, P., Voznyy, O., Xu, J., Zheng, X., Dinh, C. T., Fan, F., Cao, C., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19060 · Cited by 2,000
Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper
Li, C. W., Ciston, J., & Kanan, M. W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13249 · Cited by 1,728
Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200165 · Cited by 1,638
Recent Advances in Inorganic Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
Zhu, D. D., Liu, J. L., & Qiao, S. Z. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504766 · Cited by 1,594
Hoang, T. T. H., Verma, S., Ma, S., Fister, T. T., Timoshenko, J., Frenkel, A. I., Kenis, P. J. A., & Gewirth, A. A. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b01868 · Cited by 852
Grain-Boundary-Dependent CO 2 Electroreduction Activity
Feng, X., Jiang, K., Fan, S., & Kanan, M. W. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5130513 · Cited by 694
Technical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation
Haas, T., Krause, R., Weber, R., Demler, M., & Schmid, G. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0005-1 · Cited by 649
Ma, M., Trześniewski, B. J., Xie, J., & Smith, W. A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201604654 · Cited by 530
Trends in electrochemical CO2 reduction activity for open and close-packed metal surfaces
Shi, C., Hansen, H. A., Lausche, A. C., & Nørskov, J. K. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54822h · Cited by 465
Hsieh, Y.-C., Senanayake, S. D., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., & Polyansky, D. E. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01235 · Cited by 396
Insight into Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction on Surface-Molecule-Mediated Ag Nanoparticles
Kim, C., Eom, T., Jee, M. S., Jung, H., Kim, H., Min, B. K., & Hwang, Y. J. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01862 · Cited by 265
Nitrogen-Based Catalysts for the Electrochemical Reduction of CO 2 to CO
Tornow, C. E., Thorson, M. R., Ma, S., Gewirth, A. A., & Kenis, P. J. A. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja308217w · Cited by 190
Cited by
Catalyst–electrolyte interface chemistry for electrochemical CO2 reduction
Sa, Y. J., Lee, C. W., Lee, S. Y., Na, J., Lee, U., & Hwang, Y. J. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00030b · Cited by 468
Zhang, N., Zhang, X., Tao, L., Jiang, P., Ye, C., Lin, R., Huang, Z., Li, A., Pang, D., Yan, H., et al. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202014718 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, D., Xu, X., Qin, Y., Jiang, S. P., & Shao, Z.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-58
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2985384947
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
