Cited by 649CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Technical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation

Haas, Thomas, Krause, Ralf, Weber, Rainer, Demler, Martin, Schmid, Guenter·2018·Nature Catalysis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41929-017-0005-1

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been increasing mechanistic understanding and many encouraging signs of experimental progress on the complicated multi-electron and multi-proton transfer reaction system of electrochemical CO2RR.

    “There has been increasing mechanistic understanding as well as many encouraging signs of experimental progress on this complicated multi-electron and multi-proton transfer reaction system.192,315,322, 323, 324, 325, 326”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [323]

  • On the catalyst surface, pure metallic phase Cu was revealed; however, the presence of subsurface oxygen was correlated with higher C2 selectivity, with the enhancement attributed to changes in the electronic structure of the Cu that enhance the binding of *CO.

    “On the catalyst surface, pure metallic phase Cu was revealed; however, the presence of subsurface oxygen was correlated with higher C2 selectivity, with the enhancement attributed to changes in the electronic structure of the Cu that enhance the binding of *CO.”
  • Eilert et al. recently performed in situ APXPS and TEM-EELS to reveal the presence of residual surface oxygen (e.g., Cu2O or Cu(OH)2) and trapped subsurface oxygen during reaction.

    “Eilert et al. recently performed in situ ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) and TEM electron energy loss spectroscopy (TEM-EELS) to reveal the presence of residual surface oxygen (e.g., Cu2O or Cu(OH)2) and trapped subsurface oxygen during reaction.[106]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haas, T., Krause, R., Weber, R., Demler, M., & Schmid, G.
Affiliations
  • Evonik (Germany) (DE)
  • Siemens (Germany) (DE)
  • Covestro (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Schmid, Guenter
Venue
Nature Catalysis
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
32-39
ISSN
2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782159534
Cited by
649
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 2
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
artificial photosynthesis, CO2 electrolysis, syngas production, electrochemical CO2 reduction, gas diffusion electrode, silver electrodes, fermentation, butanol, hexanol, alcohol chemistry, Faradaic efficiency, long-term electrode stability, solar energy, CO2 utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review