Cited by 18Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Treatment and Access

The utility of the generalized anxiety disorder severity scale (GADSS) with older adults in primary care

Open access
Weiss, Brandon J., Calleo, Jessica, Rhoades, Howard M., Novy, Diane M., Kunik, Mark E., Lenze, Eric J., Stanley, Melinda A.·2009·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (GADSS) is an interview rating scale designed specifically for assessing symptom severity of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), which has demonstrated positive psychometric data in a sample of adult primary care patients with GAD and panic disorder. However, the psychometric properties of the GADSS have not been evaluated for older adults. METHODS: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the GADSS, administered via telephone, with a sample of older primary care patients (n=223) referred for treatment of worry and/or anxiety. RESULTS: The GADSS demonstrated adequate internal consistency, strong inter-rater reliability, adequate convergent validity, poor diagnostic accuracy, and mixed discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide mixed preliminary support for use of the GADSS with older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20520

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The GADSS has adequate psychometric properties among older adults.

    “has adequate psychometric properties among older adults (Andreescu et al., 2008; Weiss et al., 2009).”

    From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for late-life anxiety: Similarities and differences between Veteran and community participants (2015) · cites this paper as Weiss et al., 2009

    The Discussion reports adequate internal consistency and convergent validity, strong inter-rater reliability, and a unidimensional factor structure. But it concludes that psychometric properties were mixed among older adults in primary care, citing poor diagnostic accuracy and weak divergent validity; the unqualified claim overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Meyer TJ Miller ML Metzger RL Borkovec TD Development and validity of the Penn StateWorry Scale Behav Res Ther 1990 28 487 495 2076086

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, B. J., Calleo, J., Rhoades, H. M., Novy, D. M., Kunik, M. E., Lenze, E. J., & Stanley, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Stanley, Melinda A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2009-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
E10-E15
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2164559880
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 53932, R01MH053932)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, primary care, psychometric properties, diagnostic accuracy, convergent validity, discriminant validity, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, anxiety assessment
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Referral and Consultation, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review