Cited by 35Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale validation in older adults

Open access
Andreescu, Carmen, Belnap, Bea Herbeck, Rollman, Bruce L., Houck, Patricia, Ciliberti, Caroline, Mazumdar, Sati, Shear, M Katherine, Lenze, Eric J.·2008·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (GADSS) is a validated measure of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) symptom severity. Given the high prevalence of GAD in the elderly and the need for a validated scale to assess GAD severity in this age group, the authors examined the psychometric properties of the GADSS in the elderly.Design, setting, participants The authors examined a sample of 134 elderly subjects (age 60 and above) who met diagnostic criteria for current GAD, 33 healthy elderly comparison subjects (age 60 and above) and 186 younger subjects (age 18-60) diagnosed with GAD.Results The GADSS had a high internal consistency in the elderly subjects (raw Cronbach's alpha = 0.76). Pearson correlations showed a significant positive correlation between GADSS, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety and Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Pearson correlations showed an inverse significant correlation between GADSS and the Medical Outcome Study SF-36. There was no correlation between GADSS and Mini Mental State Examination or Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics.Conclusions The results showed a good convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity of the GADSS when used for elderly with GAD. The authors conclude that GADSS is a valid measure of GAD symptom severity in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jgp.0b013e31817c6aab

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]First MSR Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) 2.0 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreescu, C., Belnap, B. H., Rollman, B. L., Houck, P., Ciliberti, C., Mazumdar, S., Shear, M. K., & Lenze, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Andreescu, Carmen
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
813-818
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044938441
Cited by
35
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P50 071944, R01 059395, R01 070547)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059395, P30MH071944, R01MH070547)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, anxiety symptom severity, psychometric validation, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, SF-36
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review