Cited by 271Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder‐7 Scale in an Acute Psychiatric Sample

Kertz, Sarah, Bigda‐Peyton, Joe, Bjorgvinsson, Throstur·2013·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most prevalent psychiatric presentations; however, GAD has the lowest diagnostic reliability of the anxiety disorders and is poorly recognized in clinical practice. A more reliable assessment of GAD could lead to earlier detection and treatment of the disorder, which has an otherwise debilitating course and significant associated impairment. The 7‐item GAD Scale (GAD‐7) has shown promise as a measure with good clinical utility and strong psychometric properties in primary care and community settings but has yet to be assessed in acute psychiatric populations. This study examined the validity of the GAD‐7 in a sample of 232 patients enrolled in a partial hospital programme. Patients completed a diagnostic interview and a battery of self‐report measures before and after treatment. Findings suggest that the GAD‐7 has good internal consistency and good convergent validity with worry, anxiety, depression and stress, and the measure was sensitive to change over the course of a short intensive cognitive–behavioural therapy partial hospital programme. However, the confirmatory analysis failed to support the hypothesized unidimensional factor structure; and although the GAD‐7 demonstrated good sensitivity (.83), specificity was poor (.46) in identifying patients with GAD. Overall, the GAD‐7 appears to be a valid measure of generalized anxiety symptoms in this sample, on the basis of good internal consistency, convergent validity and sensitivity to change, but does not perform well as a screener for GAD. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: The GAD‐7 Scale is an easy‐to‐score, self‐report measure of core generalized anxiety disorder symptoms. The GAD‐7 Scale has good internal consistency and convergent validity with depression, anxiety, stress and worry, and is sensitive to change. The GAD‐7 Scale appears to be a good measure of generalized anxiety symptoms in an acute psychiatric sample. The GAD‐7 Scale does not perform well as a screener for GAD and should not be used to identify cases of GAD in acute psychiatric samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.1802

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kertz, S., Bigda‐Peyton, J., & Bjorgvinsson, T.
Affiliations
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • McLean Hospital Belmont MA USA
Corresponding author
Kertz, Sarah
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
456-464
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1487151488
Cited by
271
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7, generalized anxiety disorder, scale validity, acute psychiatric inpatients, partial hospitalization, cognitive behavioral therapy, sensitivity to change, convergent validity, internal consistency, factor structure, screening, depression, stress, worry
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, New England, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review