Cited by 81Treatment of Major DepressionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthTryptophan and brain disorders

AUGMENTATION OF FLUOXETINE WITH LOVASTATIN FOR TREATING MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED-CLINICAL TRIAL: Lovastatin for Treating Depression

Ghanizadeh, Ahmad, Hedayati, Arvin·2013·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: There are contradictory evidence about the effect of statins on depression. This 6-week-randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of lovastatin as an adjuvant agent for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: The participants were 68 patients with MDD according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. The sample was randomly allocated into fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) plus lovastatin (30 mg/day) group or fluoxetine plus placebo group. Hamilton Depression Rating scale was used to measure depression score at baseline, week 2, and week 6. RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant decrease of depression score on the Hamilton Depression scale. However, the treatment group decreased depression score more than placebo group [12.8(6.3) vs. 8.2(4.0), t = 3.4, df = 60, P < .001]. Any serious adverse effect was not found. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that lovastatin as an adjuvant treatment may be effective for treating patients with MDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22195

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an RCT, participants with major depressive disorder allocated to lovastatin augmentation showed a significant reduction in HDRS scores compared with a placebo group.

    “By the end of this trial, the group allocated to lovastatin augmentation showed a significant reduction in HDRS scores compared with those measured for a placebo group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghanizadeh, A., & Hedayati, A.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Ghanizadeh, Ahmad
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2013-09-30
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1084-1088
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1901734004
Cited by
81
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
major depressive disorder, fluoxetine, lovastatin, statins, adjuvant therapy, antidepressant augmentation, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, drug safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Synergism, Drug Therapy, Combination, Fluoxetine, Humans, Lovastatin, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review