Cited by 84Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDigital Mental Health InterventionsSleep and related disorders

Internet-based guided self-help for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Randomized controlled trial

Open access
Lewis, Catrin E., Farewell, Daniel, Groves, Vicky, Kitchiner, Neil J., Roberts, Neil P., Vick, Tracey, Bisson, Jonathan I.·2017·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are numerous barriers that limit access to evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Internet-based guided self-help is a treatment option that may help widen access to effective intervention, but the approach has not been sufficiently explored for the treatment of PTSD. METHODS: Forty two adults with DSM-5 PTSD of mild to moderate severity were randomly allocated to internet-based self-help with up to 3 h of therapist assistance, or to a delayed treatment control group. The internet-based program included eight modules that focused on psychoeducation, grounding, relaxation, behavioural activation, real-life and imaginal exposure, cognitive therapy, and relapse prevention. The primary outcome measure was reduction in clinician-rated traumatic stress symptoms using the clinician administered PTSD scale for DSM-V (CAPS-5). Secondary outcomes were self-reported PTSD symptoms, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, perceived social support, and functional impairment. RESULTS: Posttreatment, the internet-based guided self-help group had significantly lower clinician assessed PTSD symptoms than the delayed treatment control group (between-group effect size Cohen's d = 1.86). The difference was maintained at 1-month follow-up and dissipated once both groups had received treatment. Similar patterns of difference between the two groups were found for depression, anxiety, and functional impairment. The average contact with treating clinicians was 2½ h. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based trauma-focused guided self-help for PTSD is a promising treatment option that requires far less therapist time than current first line face-to-face psychological therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22645

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data on the efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy are available for a wide range of psychological disorders, including stress-related disorders.

    “Currently, data on the efficacy of ICBT are available for a wide range of psychological disorders, including stress-related disorders [19–23].”

    From An internet-based intervention for adjustment disorder (TAO): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Discussion (section 4, page unavailable) reports that internet-based guided self-help reduced PTSD symptoms compared with delayed treatment, supporting the stress-related-disorder example. This trial concerns PTSD of mild to moderate severity; it does not itself establish efficacy across a wide range of psychological disorders. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bisson, J., Roberts, N., Andrew, M., Cooper, R., & Lewis, C. (2013). Psychological therapies for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD003388.
  2. Sijbrandij, M., Kunovski, I., & Cuijpers, P. (2016). Effectiveness of internet- delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for posttraumatic stress dis- order: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 33(9), 783-791.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, C. E., Farewell, D., Groves, V., Kitchiner, N. J., Roberts, N. P., Vick, T., & Bisson, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Catrin E.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-29
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
555-565
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617965641
Cited by
84
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Technology Strategy Board (KTP008512)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, online therapy, imaginal exposure, behavioral activation, grounding, relapse prevention, access to mental health care, depression, anxiety, functional disability, social support, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review