Cited by 84Digital Mental Health InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disorders

Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A systematic review

Open access
Simon, Natalie, McGillivray, Leah, Roberts, Neil P., Barawi, Kali, Lewis, Catrin E., Bisson, Jonathan I.·2019·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT) offers potential as an alternative, accessible, clinically and cost-effective treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but little is known about its acceptability.Objective: To review the available evidence to understand the acceptability of i-CBT for PTSD.Method: We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review according to Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of i-CBT for adults with PTSD. We examined included studies for measures of acceptability, and possible proxy indicators of acceptability, including dropout rates, which were meta-analysed as risk ratios (RRs).Results: Ten studies with 720 participants were included. We found i-CBT to be acceptable according to specific acceptability measures, and suggestions for acceptability according to some proxy measures of i-CBT programme usage. There was, however, evidence of greater dropout from i-CBT than waitlist (RR 1.39, CI 1.03–1.88; 8 studies; participants = 585) and no evidence of a difference in dropout between i-CBT and i-non-CBT (RR 2.14, CI 0.97–4.73; participants = 132; 2 studies).Conclusion: i-CBT appears a potentially acceptable intervention for adults with PTSD. We identified clinical and research questions, including the status of proxy indicators, and call for standardised, consistent treatment acceptability measurement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008198.2019.1646092

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Higgins J. P. T., & Green S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org. G
  2. Kehle-Forbes S., & Kimerling R. (2017). Patient engagement in PTSD treatment, in PTSD research quarterly (pp. 1– 10). Vermont, USA: National Center for PTSD.
  3. Review Manager (RevMan).(2014). Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3 Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.
  4. Simon N., Bisson J. I., Lewis C. E., & Barawi K. (2017). Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy as a psychological treatment for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A systematic review. Retrieved fom http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017069732 PMC6719262 31497259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, N., McGillivray, L., Roberts, N. P., Barawi, K., Lewis, C. E., & Bisson, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB)
Corresponding author
Simon, Natalie
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2019-08-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1646092-1646092
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970971274
Cited by
84
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, acceptability, treatment discontinuation, online intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review