Cited by 33Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Uniform data set language measures for bvFTD and PPA diagnosis and monitoring

Open access
Staffaroni, Adam M., Weintraub, Sandra, Rascovsky, Katya, Rankin, Katherine P., Taylor, Jack, Fields, Julie A., Casaletto, Kaitlin B., Hillis, Argye E. +10 more·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Abstract

Introduction: The Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Module (FTLD‐MOD) includes a neuropsychological battery designed to assess the clinical features of FTLD, although much is unknown about its utility. We investigated FTLD‐MOD and Uniform Data Set 3.0 (UDS) language tests for differential diagnosis and disease monitoring. Methods: Linear regressions compared baseline performances in 1655 National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center participants (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, n = 612), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA, n = 185), non‐fluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfvPPA, n = 168), logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA, n = 109), and controls (n = 581)). Sample sizes to detect treatment effects were estimated using longitudinal data. Results: Among PPAs, the FTLD‐MOD language tasks and UDS Multilingual Naming Test accurately discriminated svPPA. Number Span Forward best discriminated lvPPA; Phonemic:Semantic Fluency ratio was excellent for nfvPPA classification. UDS fluency and naming measures required the smallest sample size to detect meaningful change. Discussion: The FTLD‐MOD and UDS differentiated among PPA subtypes. UDS 3.0 measures performed best for longitudinal monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dad2.12148

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Irregular word reading, word-picture matching, and semantic association are more impaired in people with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia than in those with non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.

    “Irregular word reading, word-picture matching, and semantic association are more impaired in people with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia than in those with non-fluent primary progressive aphasia.43”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staffaroni, A. M., Weintraub, S., Rascovsky, K., Rankin, K. P., Taylor, J., Fields, J. A., Casaletto, K. B., Hillis, A. E., Lukic, S., Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Heuer, H., Teylan, M. A., Kukull, W. A., Miller, B. L., Boeve, B. F., Rosen, H. J., Boxer, A. L., & Kramer, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Feinberg School of Medicine Department of Neurology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Staffaroni, Adam M.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
e12148-e12148
ISSN
2352-8729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131330772
Cited by
33
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Larry L. Hillblom Foundation (2018‐A‐0‐FEL, 2017‐A‐004‐FEL)
  • National Science Foundation (P30 AG019610, P30 AG013846, P30 AG062428‐01, P50 AG008702, P50 AG025688, P50 AG047266, P30 AG010133, P50 AG005146, P30 AG062421‐01, P30 AG062422‐01, P50 AG005138, P30 AG008051, P30 AG013854, P30 AG008017, P30 AG010161, P50 AG047366, P30 AG010129, P50 AG016573, P30 AG062429‐01, P50 AG023501, P30 AG035982, P30 AG028383, P30 AG053760, P30 AG010124, P50 AG005133, P50 AG005142, P30 AG012300, P30 AG049638, P50 AG005136, P30 AG062715‐01, P50 AG005681, P50 AG047270)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, semantic variant PPA, logopenic variant PPA, language assessment, differential diagnosis, disease surveillance, sample size determination, naming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review