Cited by 154Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

A longitudinal study of language decline in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia

BLAIR, MERVIN, MARCZINSKI, CECILE A., DAVIS-FAROQUE, NICOLE, KERTESZ, ANDREW·2007·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Language decline is usually the fastest and predominant change in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). In Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is usually associated with global cognitive deficits. Decreased speech output, reduced conversational initiation, echolalia, and changes in the pragmatics of conversation are seen in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-bv), however, the evolution of language disturbance in FTD-bv patients is rarely examined systematically with a standardized language battery. We aimed to longitudinally track the nature of language change in FTD-bv, PPA, and AD using a standardized measure of language functioning. We also explored the nature of language deficits between semantic dementia (SD) patients and the fluent subgroup of PPA patients. The Western Aphasia Battery was administered to 105 AD, 20 FTD-bv, 54 PPA, and 10 SD patients on 2 occasions with approximately 1 year between assessments. Ninety-nine of these patients were examined an additional year. FTD-bv and PPA patients showed a faster language decline than AD patients. The eventual overlap in language functioning in FTD-bv and PPA suggests that these syndromes belong to the same spectrum of disorders. In conclusion, longitudinal language assessment provides us with a unique understanding of the evolution and progression of language deterioration in various dementias. (JINS, 2007, 13, 237–245.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617707070269

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLAIR, M., MARCZINSKI, C. A., DAVIS-FAROQUE, N., & KERTESZ, A.
Affiliations
St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2007-02-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
237-245
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2091134191
Cited by
154
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
language loss, Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, semantic dementia, Western Aphasia Battery, language deterioration
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Dementia, Female, Humans, Language Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Disease Progression, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review