Cited by 30Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Context-dependent individual differences in playfulness in male rats

Open access
Lampe, Jessica F., Burman, Oliver, Würbel, Hanno, Melotti, Luca·2017·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

Play has been proposed as an indicator of positive emotions and welfare in higher vertebrates. This study investigated playfulness in male rats by exploring its consistency across motivational states (with/without prior short social isolation) and two age points at early and late adolescence. Twenty-four male Lister Hooded rats housed in cages of four underwent two play tests: conspecific Play-in-Pairs and Tickling by the experimenter, which were compared with play in the home cage and basal anxiety levels. Play-in-Pairs measures were consistent across age and motivational states, and were independent from anxiety. Positively valenced vocalizations in the Tickling test were also consistent across age, yet were negatively related to anxiety. Play-in-Pairs and Tickling play contexts, as well as social and solitary play types, were unrelated. Therefore, this study supports the existence of consistent individual differences in playfulness in rats, and suggests that different play contexts and types represent motivationally distinct systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.21509

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even within members of the same sex and same strain, not all individual rats play to the same degree; some rats consistently play more than others.

    “Even within members of the same sex and same strain, not all individuals play to the same degree—some rats consistently play more than others (Lampe et al., 2017; Lesscher et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lampe, J. F., Burman, O., Würbel, H., & Melotti, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Melotti, Luca
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
460-472
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2591641658
Cited by
30
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_144088)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
playfulness, individual differences, rats, social isolation, adolescence, anxiety, positive emotions, welfare indicators, tickling, vocalizations, social play, solitary play, motivational states
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Individuality, Male, Social Behavior, Vocalization, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review