The performance of human infants on a measure of frontal cortex function, the delayed response task
Abstract
The Delayed Response task is the best-established marker of frontal lobe function in nonhuman primates. This article reports the developmental progression of human infants on that task. It is proposed that maturation of prefrontal cortex may make possible these age-related improvements in Delayed Response performance. This would suggest the importance of prefrontal cortex functioning very early in life. Twelve infants (6 male, 6 female) were tested longitudinally every two weeks from 6-12 months of age. Another 36 infants (18 male, 18 female) were tested only once: 12 each at 8, 10, and 12 months. We predicted that infants would improve on Delayed Response over these ages because infants' performance on AB improves during this time, and Delayed Response is very similar to AB. The AB task, devised by Piaget, is used to study cognitive development in infants. The ages over which AB performance improves are well established. In both AB and Delayed Response, the subject watches as the experimenter hides a desired object in one of two identical wells. After a brief delay, the subject is allowed to reach. In AB, the object is hidden in the same well on subsequent trials until the subject reaches to the correct well; then side of hiding is reversed and the procedure repeated. In Delayed Response, side of hiding is varied randomly over trials. In the present study of Delayed Response each testing session consisted of 16 trials (eight to the right, eight to the left). We found: (1) the developmental progression for Delayed Response is almost identical to that for AB. (2) Infants of 7 1/2-9 months fail Delayed Response under the same conditions and in the same ways as do monkeys with lesions of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. It is therefore suggested that AB and Delayed Response require the same cognitive abilities, and that improved performance on these tasks provides an index of maturation of frontal cortex function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Primitive signs of inhibition and working memory can be observed in infancy.
“primitive signs of inhibition and working memory can be observed in infancy”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Diamond & Doar, 1989
Executive function emerges much earlier than early adolescence.
“It is now well established that executive function emerges much earlier than this”
From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Diamond & Doar, 1989
Cites
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 · Cited by 2,695 · see citing works
Assessment and Development of Executive Function (EF) During Childhood
Anderson, P. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 · Cited by 2,218 · see citing works
“Infants younger than 9 months of age have difficulty inhibiting previously learned responses, but by 12 months of age most infants can inhibit certain behaviors and shift to a new response set (Diamond, 1985; Diamond & Doar, 1989; Diamond & Goldman-Rakic, 1989).”
BackgroundA developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go-no-go task
Casey, B. J., Trainor, R. J., Orendi, J. L., Schubert, A. B., Nystrom, L. E., Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Haxby, J. V., Noll, D. C., Cohen, J. D., et al. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.835 · Cited by 1,106 · see citing works
Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism
Hill, E. L. (2004) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2004.01.001 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.5.3.263 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control
Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluğ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00235 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
The orbitofrontal-amygdala circuit and self-regulation of social-emotional behavior in autism
Bachevalier, J., & Loveland, K. A. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.002 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
The development of regulatory functions from birth to 5 years: insights from premature infants
Feldman, R. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01278.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers
Anderson, P. J., & Reidy, N. (2012) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-012-9220-3 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Chapter 9 Neuronal development in human prefrontal cortex in prenatal and postnatal stages
Mrzljak, L., Uylings, H. B. M., Van Eden, G. G., & Judáš, M. (1991) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62681-3 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
The emergence and basis of endogenous attention in infancy and early childhood
Colombo, J., & Cheatham, C. L. (2006) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80010-8 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Developmental Consequences of Childhood Frontal Lobe Damage
Eslinger, P. J., Grattan, L. M., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1992) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1992.00530310112021 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Lewis, E. E., Dozier, M., Ackerman, J., & Sepulveda-Kozakowski, S. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1415 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Child Development and Neuroscience.
Nelson, C. A., & Bloom, F. E. (1997) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01974.x · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Abbruzzese, M., Ferri, S., & Scarone, S. (1997) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00095-4 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T. D., & Nelson, J. M. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01012.x · Cited by 176 · see citing works
New Procedures to Assess Executive Functions in Preschool Children*
Espy, K. A., Kaufmann, P. M., Glisky, M. L., & McDiarmid, M. D. (2001) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.15.1.46.1908 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Ontogenesis of goal-directed behavior: anatomo-functional considerations
Kostović, I., Judaš, M., Petanjek, Z., & Šimić, G. (1995) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/0167-8760(94)00081-o · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Prefrontal Executive Function Syndromes in Children
Powell, K. B., & Voeller, K. K. S. (2004) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/08830738040190100801 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Conejero, Á., Guerra, S., Abundis‐Gutiérrez, A., & Rueda, M. R. (2018) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12494 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Diamond, A., & Doar, B.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Diamond, Adele
- ORCID
- Diamond, Adele
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-294
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W2122532993
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2s07rr007054-26)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH/HD41842)
- National Center for Research Resources (S07RR07054-22)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- delayed response task, prefrontal cortex maturation, infant cognitive development, object permanence, Piaget, frontal lobe function
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Child Development, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
