Cited by 152Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesWound Healing and Treatments

Guidelines on the classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update).

Open access
Monteiro‐Soares, Matilde, Hamilton, Emma J., Russell, David A., Srisawasdi, Gulapar, Boyko, Edward J., Mills, Joseph L., Jeffcoate, William, Game, Frances·2024·Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This publication represents a scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to classify foot ulcers in people with diabetes in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are based on a systematic review of the available literature that identified 28 classifications addressed in 149 articles and, subsequently, expert opinion using the GRADE methodology. METHODS: First, we have developed a list of classification systems considered as being potentially adequate for use in a clinical setting, through the summary of judgements for diagnostic tests, focussing on the usability, accuracy and reliability of each system to predict ulcer-related complications as well as use of resources. Second, we have determined, following group debate and consensus, which of them should be used in specific clinical scenarios. Following this process, in a person with diabetes and a foot ulcer we recommend: (a) for communication among healthcare professionals: to use the SINBAD (Site, Ischaemia, Bacterial infection, Area and Depth) system (first option) or consider using WIfI (Wound, Ischaemia, foot Infection) system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise is available and it is considered feasible) and in each case the individual variables that compose the systems should be described rather than a total score; (b) for predicting the outcome of an ulcer in a specific individual: no existing system could be recommended; (c) for characterising a person with an infected ulcer: the use of the IDSA/IWGDF classification (first option) or consider using the WIfI system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise is available and it is considered as feasible); (d) for characterising a person with peripheral artery disease: consider using the WIfI system as a means to stratify healing likelihood and amputation risk; (e) for the audit of outcome(s) of populations: the use of the SINBAD score. CONCLUSIONS: For all recommendations made using GRADE, the certainty of evidence was judged, at best, as being low. Nevertheless, based on the rational application of current data this approach allowed the proposal of recommendations, which are likely to have clinical utility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmrr.3648

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 40% of people with Charcot arthropathy have concomitant tissue loss; a unilateral red, hot, swollen foot without a wound or diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis may indicate Charcot arthropathy.

    “Although approximately 40% of people with Charcot arthropathy have concomitant tissue loss, a unilateral red, hot, swollen foot without a wound or diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis may indicate Charcot arthropathy.32”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Clinical question section (Table 3, p. 8) lists acute Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy and thrombosis as possible causes of skin inflammation, alongside swelling, erythema and warmth. It does not report that approximately 40% of people with Charcot arthropathy have tissue loss or state the proposed diagnostic rule involving a unilateral foot without a wound or deep vein thrombosis. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Charcot arthropathy affects approximately 0.3% of people with diabetes, can lead to significant deformity, and increases the risk of a diabetic foot ulcer, particularly in the midfoot and ankle/hindfoot.

    “Charcot arthropathy, defined as a foot fracture with possible joint dislocation in people with peripheral neuropathy, affects approximately 0.3% of people with diabetes, can lead to significant deformity, and increases the risk of a diabetic foot ulcer, particularly in the midfoot and ankle/hindfoot.32”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Clinical question section mentions acute Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy only as a possible cause of skin inflammation, and the Rationale section lists foot deformity as a variable in a separate ulcer score (page numbers not supplied). Searches for Charcot, 0.3%, and midfoot/ankle/hindfoot found no passage supporting the claimed prevalence, definition, deformity, or ulcer risk. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas Tenth Edition. IDF Diabetes Atlas; 2021.
  2. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489. 470347.ad · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wagner F. A classification and treatment program for diabetic, neuropathic, and dysvascular foot problems. Instr Course Lect. 1979; 28(1):143-165.
  4. Monteiro-Soares M, Hamilton EJ, Russell D, et al. Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a systematic review. DMRR. 2023.
  5. Ali SM, Basit A, Fawwad A, Ahmedani MY, Miyan Z, Malik RA. Presentation and outcome of diabetic foot at a tertiary care unit. Pak J Med Sci. 2008;24(5):651-656.
  6. NDFCA. NDFA Interval Review: July 2014-March 2021; 2022. https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/REF240_ND FA-Rep_FINAL-v1.1-20220511.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteiro‐Soares, M., Hamilton, E. J., Russell, D. A., Srisawasdi, G., Boyko, E. J., Mills, J. L., Jeffcoate, W., & Game, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Siriraj Hospital (TH)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Game, Frances
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-14
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
e3648-e3648
ISSN
  • 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-7560
OpenAlex
W4376507548
Cited by
152
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20
FWCI
30.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300633)
  • Raine Medical Research Foundation
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (LA/P/0053/2020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, peripheral arterial disease, wound infection, amputation risk
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Diabetic Foot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review