Cited by 139Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Attachment and mentalization and their association with child and adolescent eating pathology: A systematic review

Open access
Jewell, Tom, Collyer, Hannah, Gardner, Tessa, Tchanturia, Kate, Simic, Mima, Fonagy, Peter, Eisler, Ivan·2016·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Insecure attachment and mentalizing difficulties have been associated with eating pathology in adulthood. However, it is unclear whether eating pathology is associated with attachment or mentalization in children. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature in this emerging field. METHOD: Electronic databases were used to search for articles. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified. In the 15 studies investigating attachment, an association with eating pathology was found in all studies. Mentalizing difficulties and eating pathology were found to be correlated in the seven studies which examined their association. DISCUSSION: In keeping with the adult literature, cross-sectional studies of children and adolescents consistently report associations with eating pathology. There is some evidence from prospective studies that insecure attachment may be a risk factor for the development of eating pathology in adolescence. The literature on mentalization and eating pathology suggests that adolescents with anorexia nervosa may have difficulties in recognizing emotions. Further research using clinical samples and well-validated measures of attachment and mentalization are required to shed further light on this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22473

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failures in mentalizing contribute to explaining pathways to depression and anxiety.

    “It turned out that failures in mentalizing contribute to explaining pathways to depression and anxiety.”

    From Failures in Reflective Functioning and Reported Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Bereaved Individuals: A Study on a Sample of Family Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion reports limited evidence linking mentalizing difficulties with child and adolescent eating pathology, while Implications for theory describes mentalizing failures under affective arousal. Neither section says that those failures explain pathways to depression or anxiety; searches for those outcomes found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Luyten and colleagues argued that mentalizing impairment rooted in insecure attachment relationships and more generally in adverse early childhood experiences may lead to major depressive disorder.

    “For example, Luyten and colleagues argued that mentalizing impairment rooted in insecure attachment relationships and more generally in adverse early childhood experiences may lead to major depressive disorder [15].”

    From Failures in Reflective Functioning and Reported Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Bereaved Individuals: A Study on a Sample of Family Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Mentalization and Implications for theory sections discuss how insecure or misattuned attachment relationships may relate to mentalizing difficulties, but in the context of eating pathology. Searches for Luyten, major depressive disorder, and adverse early childhood experiences found no passage attributing the claimed argument to Luyten or linking that pathway to major depressive disorder. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Armstrong JG, Roth DM. Attachment and separation difficulties in eating disorders: A preliminary investigation. Int J Eat Disorder 1989;8:141-155
  2. Ward A, Ramsay R, Turnbull S, Benedettini M, Treasure J. Attachment patterns in eating disorders: Past in the present. Int J Eat Disorder 2000;28:370-376.
  3. Kerns KA. Attachment in middle childhood. In Cassidy J, Shaver P, editors. Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical implications. New York: Guilford Press; 2008, pp. 366-382
  4. Kuipers GS, Bekker, MHJ. Attachment, mentalization and eating disorders: a review of studies using the adult attachment interview. Curr Psychiat Rev 2012;8:326-336.
  5. Sharpe TM, Killen JD, Bryson SW, Shisslak CM, Estes LS, Gray N et al. Attachment style and weight concerns in preadolescent and adolescent girls. Int J Eat Disorder 1998;23:39-44.
  6. Cassidy J, Marvin R, The MacArthur Working Group. Attachment organization in preschool children manual, 4th edition. Unpublished manuscript: University of Virginia; 1992.
  7. Wood A, Waller G, Miller J, Slade P. The development of Eating Attitude Test Scores in adolescence. Int J Eat Disorder 1992; 11: 279-282.
  8. Fairburn C, Beglin S. The assessment of eating disorders: Interview versus questionnaire. Int J Eat Disorder 1994; 16: 363-370.
  9. Murray H. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge, MA: Unpublished manual; 1943.
  10. O'Kearney, R. (1996). Attachment disruption in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A review of theory and empirical research. Int J Eat Disord 1996:20;115-127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jewell, T., Collyer, H., Gardner, T., Tchanturia, K., Simic, M., Fonagy, P., & Eisler, I.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Jewell, Tom
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-22
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
354-373
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2209362319
Cited by
139
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10157, CDRF-2014-05-024)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insecure attachment, mentalization, eating pathology, eating disorders in children, adolescent eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, emotion recognition, eating disorder risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review