Cited by 29Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Adherence as a predictor of dropout in internet-based guided self-help for adults with binge-eating disorder and overweight or obesity

Open access
Puls, Hans‐Christian, Schmidt, Ricarda, Herpertz, Stephan, Zipfel, Stephan, Tuschen‐Caffier, Brunna, Friederich, Hans‐Christoph, Gerlach, Frauke, Mayr, Andreas +4 more·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Internet-based guided self-help (GSH-I) is an efficacious treatment for adults with binge-eating disorder (BED) and overweight or obesity. Although broadly accessible, high dropout from GSH-I has been reported. However, little is known about the factors explaining dropout from GSH-I, including patients' adherence to treatment. METHOD: Within a randomized trial on the treatment of BED, adherence to 4-month GSH-I was objectively assessed in N = 89 patients with BED and overweight or obesity. Objective adherence and subjective treatment evaluation were evaluated as predictors of dropout from GSH-I, defined as having accessed 5 or less of 11 modules. Cutoffs with optimal sensitivity and specificity were derived using Receiver Operating Characteristics curves analysis, and baseline sociodemographic and clinical correlates were determined. RESULTS: According to our definition, n = 22 (24.7%) patients were defined as dropouts. Results of the full logistic regression model accounted for 72% of the variance in dropout and all objective adherence parameters (i.e., number of messages exchanged, days with a completed food diary, and days spent per module), but not patients' subjective GSH-I evaluation significantly predicted dropout. Specifically, not completing the food diary in week 7 had maximized sensitivity and specificity in predicting dropout. Patients' body mass index was positively associated with the number of messages exchanged between patients and coaches. No other associations between baseline variables and objective adherence were found. DISCUSSION: Patients at risk for dropout from GSH-I can be reliably identified via monitoring of objective adherence and may be provided with additional interventions to prevent dropout.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23220

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This aligns with evidence suggesting early dropout in ED-focused online programs might be predicted by baseline characteristics that reflect more complex mental health presentations, affirming the need for additional support for such individuals, e.g., face-to-face CBT.

    “This aligns with evidence suggesting early dropout in ED-focused online programs might be predicted by baseline characteristics that reflect more complex mental health presentations (58), affirming the need for additional support for such individuals, e.g., face-to-face CBT (59).”

    From The acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a supported online self-help treatment program for binge-eating disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [59]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z. & O'Connor, M. E. (2014). Eating Disorder Examination (Edition 17.0D). Retrieved from https://www.credo- oxford.com/pdfs/EDE_17.0D.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puls, H., Schmidt, R., Herpertz, S., Zipfel, S., Tuschen‐Caffier, B., Friederich, H., Gerlach, F., Mayr, A., Lam, T., Schade‐Brittinger, C., de Zwaan, M., & Hilbert, A.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • NetUnion (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Corresponding author
Puls, Hans‐Christian
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-31
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
555-563
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2996855266
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01EO1501, 01GV0601, 01GV1002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
binge eating disorder, obesity, overweight, treatment discontinuation, medication adherence, body mass index, student dropout prediction, digital mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Patient Compliance, Self-Help Groups, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet, Overweight, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review