Cited by 3Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

eHealth treatments for compulsive overeating: A narrative review

Moghimi, Elnaz, Davis, Caroline A., Rotondi, Michael·2020·Current Addiction Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-020-00312-0

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moghimi, E., Davis, C. A., & Rotondi, M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Davis, Caroline A.
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2020-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
395-404
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026674549
Cited by
3
References
120
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
compulsive eating, digital health interventions, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, treatment discontinuation, treatment engagement, multimedia formats, medication adherence, eating disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review