Cited by 8Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Evaluating the feasibility and potential efficacy of a brief eTherapy for binge‐eating disorder: A pilot study

Open access
Rom, Sean, Miskovic‐Wheatley, Jane, Barakat, Sarah, Aouad, Phillip, Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Matthew, Maguire, Sarah·2022·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For those with binge-eating disorder (BED), access to evidence-based, face-to-face treatment is often constrained by clinician availability and high treatment costs. Emerging evidence suggests online therapy (eTherapy) may navigate these barriers and reduce binge-eating symptomatology; however, less evaluation has been done in those with BED, particularly with briefer programs targeting early change. This study investigated the feasibility and potential efficacy of a brief, supported eTherapy in those with BED or subthreshold BED. METHOD: Participants were 19 women with BED who completed a four-session eTherapy. This was a single-arm, pre-post intervention study, with participants completing weekly content and attending telehealth sessions. Key outcomes were assessed by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-Short (EDE-QS): objective binge episode days, loss of control over eating days, and eating disorder (ED) psychopathology via a total EDE-QS score. RESULTS: Generalized and linear mixed models showed significantly reduced loss of control over eating days and ED psychopathology. Program feasibility was high, with strong program adherence and a below average attrition rate. DISCUSSION: Pilot results support the feasibility and potential efficacy of a brief, behavioral-focused eTherapy program in reducing ED pathology in those with BED. Future research should further investigate findings in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests that a brief, behavioral-focused online therapy, guided by non-expert clinicians, can be successfully administered to those with binge-eating disorder (BED) and may be efficacious at reducing eating disorder and other related symptomatology. Brief eTherapies that are effective, accessible, and rapidly available may facilitate earlier intervention in illness and improve treatment outcomes for individuals who experience this common and distressing disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23803

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A preliminary evaluation of the SSH-BEeT program found promising reductions in key ED symptomatology in individuals with BED who completed the first four sessions (Brief SSH BEeT).

    “A preliminary evaluation of the program found promising reductions in key ED symptomatology in individuals with BED who completed the first four sessions of treatment, which comprise the Brief Supported Self-Help BEeT Program (Brief SSH BEeT) (32).”
  • The dropout rate (26%) was lower than the average rate of 32% estimated in a meta-analysis of BED eTherapies and comparable to the rates of 21 and 16% found in the pilots of the briefer, four-session version of this eTherapy in individuals with BED and BN.

    “The dropout rate (26%) was lower than the average rate of 32% estimated in a meta-analysis of BED eTherapies (57) and comparable to the rates of 21 and 16% found in the pilots of the briefer, four-session version of this eTherapy in individuals with BED and BN (32, 54).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rom, S., Miskovic‐Wheatley, J., Barakat, S., Aouad, P., Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, M., & Maguire, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Rom, Sean
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-20
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1614-1620
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W4292543173
Cited by
8
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NSW Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
binge eating disorder, online therapy, brief behavioral intervention, telemedicine, loss of control over eating, eating disorder psychopathology, treatment feasibility, program adherence, attrition, women
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review