Cited by 15Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMental Health Research Topics

Recruiting participants to an Internet‐based eating disorder prevention trial: Impact of the recruitment strategy on symptom severity and program utilization

Open access
Vollert, Bianka, von Bloh, Paula, Eiterich, Nadine, Beintner, Ina, Hütter, Kristian, Taylor, Craig Barr, Jacobi, Corinna·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Using data from a randomized controlled trial, we examined two different strategies to recruit participants for an indicated preventive intervention (StudentBodies‐AN) for women at risk for anorexia nervosa and compared symptom severity and program utilization in participants recruited through each strategy. Method: We recruited participants by announcing the study (a) in lectures at universities and handing out screening questionnaires (face‐to‐face recruitment) and (b) through different media channels, and the participants completed the screening questionnaire on our study website (media‐based recruitment). We compared symptom severity and program utilization between the two groups. Results: A total of 4,646 women (face‐to‐face: 3,741, media‐based: 905) were screened and 168 women (face‐to‐face: 114, media‐based: 54) were randomized to the intervention. We found a statistically and clinically significant association between recruitment strategy and symptom severity: Participants who were recruited through media were more likely to fulfill the inclusion criteria (40.6% vs. 13.3%; p < .001) and endorsed significantly more frequently core behaviors and attitudes of disordered eating (EDE global score: 2.72 vs. 2.17, p < .05; Weight Concerns Scale [WCS] score: 66.05 vs. 56.40, p < .05) at baseline than participants recruited face‐to‐face. Also, participants recruited through media were more likely to log onto the program (χ 2 = 5.06; p = .029) and accessed more of the intervention. Discussion: Recruitment through media seems both more feasible and suitable to reach individuals in need of indicative prevention, and should be part of a multimodal recruitment package. Future studies should be explicitly designed to investigate the impact of recruitment modality on reach and effectiveness including cost‐effectiveness analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23250

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory (BSI), administration, scor- ing, and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Services.
  2. Garner, D. M. (1991). EDI-2. Eating disorder Inventory-2. Professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  3. Grund, K. (2003). Validierung der Weight Concerns Scale zur Erfassung von Essstörungen. (Diploma Thesis Dissertation/Thesis, Unpublished), Universität Trier, Trier.
  4. Hautzinger, M., Keller, F., & Kühner, C. (2009). BDI-II. Beck-depressions- Inventar. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vollert, B., von Bloh, P., Eiterich, N., Beintner, I., Hütter, K., Taylor, C. B., & Jacobi, C.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany
  • Palo Alto University (US)
Corresponding author
Vollert, Bianka
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-29
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
746-754
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3007606476
Cited by
15
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
participant recruitment, eating disorder prevention, anorexia nervosa, online intervention, disordered eating symptoms, weight concern, program utilization, women at risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Patient Selection, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review