Cited by 51Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Who seeks ICBT for depression and how do they get there? Effects of recruitment source on patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Open access
Lindner, Philip, Nyström, Markus B.T., Hassmén, Peter, Andersson, Gerhard, Carlbring, Per·2015·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Studies on internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) frequently use several different sources of recruitment, yet no study has investigated whether different recruitment sources produce different clinical and demographic profiles among participants. Using data from a large sample (n = 982) seeking ICBT for depression, we compared these characteristics on the basis of self-reported recruitment source. Recruitment sources that imply more active treatment-seeking behaviors (Google searches, viewing postings on mental health websites) presented more severe depression and anxiety than those recruited through more passive sources of information (newspaper advertisements , referrals by friends and family). In addition, a number of demographic differences between groups were found. These findings have important implications for ICBT research projects and clinical programs who employ open recruitment procedures and multi-modal recruitment strategies, and who wish to recruit representative samples or target specific subgroups. Replications in other countries will however be required to establish cross-cultural patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2015.04.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindner, P., Nyström, M. B. T., Hassmén, P., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindner, Philip
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
221-225
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078572373
Cited by
51
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FORTE 2011-0477)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, recruitment sources, treatment-seeking behavior, patient demographics, clinical features, anxiety, online search, mental health websites, referral, newspaper advertising, sample representativeness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review