Cited by 50Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and EducationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Moral coherence processes: constructing culpability and consequences

Clark, Cory J, Chen, Eric Evan, Ditto, Peter H·2015·Current Opinion in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.016

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such attempts to delineate moral culpability between systems and people, or between different standards of fairness or evidence, may reflect a more general psychological need to see the world as morally coherent.

    “Such attempts to delineate moral culpability between systems and people , or between different standards of fairness or evidence, may reflect a more general psychological need to see the world as morally coherent [9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, C. J., Chen, E. E., & Ditto, P. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Ditto, Peter H
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
6
Pages
123-128
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1449134146
Cited by
50
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
moral coherence, moral reasoning, culpability, moral judgment, moral motivation, victim construction, perceived harm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review