Cited by 153Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration

Landmann, Helen, Gaschler, Robert, Rohmann, Anette·2019·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Threat is one of the most important predictors for attitudes towards refugees and migration. The current research addresses the role of different threat types and emotional reactions in the context of refugee migration with a multi‐method approach. Using qualitative (Study 1, N = 202) and quantitative (Studies 2–4, N = 873) methods, we identified six types of threat that majority group members in Germany experience in the face of refugee migration: Concerns about cultural differences ( symbolic threat ), financial strain ( realistic threat ), criminal acts ( safety threat ), conflicts within society ( cohesion threat ), increasing xenophobia ( prejudice threat ), and refugee care ( altruistic threat ). All these threat types elicited negative emotions and were associated with negative attitudes towards refugees and support for restrictive migration policies. Paradoxically, concerns about refugee care predicted support for restrictive migration policies particularly well ( altruistic threat paradox ), which can be explained by a lack of emotional responses to this type of threat. Based on these findings, we propose a bidirectional model of intergroup threat .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.2593

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotions such as anxiety, anger, fear, and contempt mediate the relation between some threats and prejudice toward immigrants.

    “There is also evidence that emotions such as anxiety, anger, fear, and contempt mediate the relation between some of the threats mentioned above and prejudice toward immigrants (Brader et al. 2008, Gadarian & Albertson 2014, Landmann et al. 2019).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Landmann et al. 2019

  • Immigrants may elicit concerns about terrorist threat, crime, and disease.

    “In terms of safety and security, immigrants may elicit concerns about terrorist threat, crime, and disease (Ceobanu 2011, Esses et al. 2019, Landmann et al. 2019, Medianu et al. 2015)”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Landmann et al. 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landmann, H., Gaschler, R., & Rohmann, A.
Affiliations
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Corresponding author
Landmann, Helen
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-18
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
1401-1420
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2937207512
Cited by
146
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
attitudes toward refugees, refugee migration, threat types, intergroup threat, emotional responses, xenophobia, restrictive migration policy, symbolic threat, financial stress, safety threats, majority group members, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review