Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 11,241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling

Guex, Nicolas, Peitsch, Manuel C.·1997·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

Comparative protein modeling is increasingly gaining interest since it is of great assistance during the rational design of mutagenesis experiments. The availability of this method, and the resulting models, has however been restricted by the availability of expensive computer hardware and software. To overcome these limitations, we have developed an environment for comparative protein modeling that consists of SWISS‐MODEL, a server for automated comparative protein modeling and of the SWISS‐PdbViewer, a sequence to structure workbench. The Swiss‐PdbViewer not only acts as a client for SWISS‐MODEL, but also provides a large selection of structure analysis and display tools. In addition, we provide the SWISS‐MODEL Repository, a database containing more than 3500 automatically generated protein models. By making such tools freely available to the scientific community, we hope to increase the use of protein structures and models in the process of experiment design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.1150181505

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1093/nar/24.1.21 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0022-2836(77)80200-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nbt0795-658 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1042/bst0240274 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/elps.1150180326 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/pro.5560021103 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0196-8858(91)90017-D · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/326347a0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04287.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/prot.340070404 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90358-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/356083a0 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/prot.340170404 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jcc.540040211 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Peitsch M. C., 1996, Receptors Channels, 4, 161
  18. 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80112-8 · DOI
  19. Guex N., 1996, Protein Data Bank Quarterly Newsletter, 77, 7
  20. 10.1021/ja00315a051 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/prot.340120407 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90173-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90153-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1021/bi00440a051 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/bi00066a010 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.3201242 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1042/bst0170301 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/978-94-011-1472-1_128 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/bi00174a014 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90290-4 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/bi00124a006 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1002/prot.340230402 · DOI

Cited by

Items 101–116 of 116

Metadata

Authors
Guex, N., & Peitsch, M. C.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
18
Issue
15
Pages
2714-2723
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2015642465
Cited by
11,241
References
2
FWCI
25.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.