CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotypic traits of primate hybrids: Recognizing admixture in the fossil record

Ackermann, Rebecca Rogers·2010·Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
DOI 10.1002/evan.20288
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

For many years, the likelihood that hybridization occurred in human evolution has been debated. Tattersall and Schwartz pointed out one of the core problems with resolving this debate, namely “that nobody has any idea what a Neanderthal/modern human hybrid might look like in theory, and few have dared to suggest in practice that any particular known fossil represents such a hybrid.” 1:7117 Moreover, while molecular data is proving increasingly useful for characterising hybrid zones, the utility of the phenotype for this purpose is not clear. 2 Here I address these issues, discussing both theoretical and empirically‐derived expectations for what hybrid morphology looks like, with an emphasis on the skeleton of hybrid primates, and consideration of the hominin fossil record.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/evan.20288

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Theoretical expectations regarding phenotypic diversity within hybrid populations predict a complex range of phenotypes including cryptic hybrids, intermediate individuals, and transgressive segregation.

    “Theoretical expectations regarding phenotypic diversity within hybrid populations predict a complex range of phenotypes that can include individuals that resemble either parental population (cryptic hybrids), those that are morphologically intermediate to parental populations, as well as individuals that display transgressive segregation (Ackermann 2010).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Ackermann 2010

  • These results support the expectation that hybrid populations are more phenotypically variable than their parental populations.

    “In short, these results also support the expectation that hybrid populations are more phenotypically variable than their parental populations (Ackermann 2010).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Ackermann 2010

  • The increased phenotypic variation in hybrids is a predictable result of allelic differences between parental taxa, as well as genome-wide dominance and epistatic effects.

    “Although the underlying genetic architecture responsible for this increased phenotypic variation is incompletely understood, it is a predictable result of allelic differences between parental taxa, as well as genome-wide dominance and epistatic effects (see discussion in Ackermann 2010).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Ackermann 2010

  • The latter leads to underestimation of actual levels of hybridization (or numbers of hybrids) within a population.

    “The latter leads to underestimation of actual levels of hybridization (or numbers of hybrids) within a population (Ackermann 2010; Kelaita and Corte ´s-Ortiz 2013).”

    From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Ackermann 2010

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7117 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00518.x · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7604 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0702214104 · DOI
  5. Arnold M, 2009, Reticulate evolution and humans: origins and ecology
  6. 10.1002/ajpa.10021 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.02.006 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.10.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/molbev/msp096 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Arnold ML, 2006, Evolution through genetic exchange
  12. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.593 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.001321 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0081 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/377663 · DOI
  18. Mishler BD, 2000, Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate, 44
  19. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00374-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01313.x · DOI
  21. Hawks J, 2006, Dynamics of adaptive introgression from archaic to modern humans, PaleoAnthropology, 101
  22. 10.1007/s10329-007-0065-y · DOI
  23. Falconer DS, 1997, Introduction to quantitative genetics
  24. Wright S, 1968, Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 1: genetic and biometric foundations
  25. 10.1002/ajp.1011 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Templeton AR, 1987, Mammalian dispersal patterns, 257
  27. 10.1186/1471-2148-9-283 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00617.x · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1086949 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/341497a0 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb05270.x · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x · DOI
  33. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01813.x · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s10764-005-4372-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00471.x · DOI
  36. 10.1023/A:1026367307470 · DOI
  37. 10.1534/genetics.107.074278 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.007 · DOI
  39. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-58 · DOI
  40. 10.1006/mpev.2000.0834 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00858.x · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004859 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.zool.2006.03.006 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S0016672305007743 · DOI
  45. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421 · DOI
  46. Kelaita MA, 2009, Morphology of genetically confirmed hybrids of Alouatta pigra and A. palliata from a natural hybrid zone in Tabasco, Mexico, Am J Phys Anthropol, 48, 163
  47. 10.1002/ajp.1350310104 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/9780470319390.ch17 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Smith RJ, 2005, Interpreting the past: essays on human, primate, and mammal evolution in honor of David Pilbeam, 207, 10.1163/9789047416616_018 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/evan.20234 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00149.x · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.0608443103 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.0610538104 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.09.009 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/evan.20181 · DOI
  57. Ackermann RR, Hybrid wildebeest (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) provide further evidence for shared signatures of admixture in mammalian crania, S Afr J Sci
  58. 10.2307/1377165 · DOI
  59. 10.2307/1383007 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1993.tb00454.x · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.038 · DOI
  62. 10.1186/1471-2148-9-83 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1002/ajpa.20187 · DOI
  64. 10.1002/ajpa.1330380304 · DOI
  65. 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00366.x · DOI
  66. BrinkJS.2005.The evolution of the black wildebeest Connochaetes gnou and modern large mammal faunas in central southern Africa. Ph.D. Thesis University of Stellenbosch.
  67. 10.1002/ca.20139 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/ajp.20445 · DOI
  69. 10.1177/002215540405200113 · DOI
  70. Jackson WP, 1951, The generalized developmental osseous dystrophies. 8. Osteo‐dental dysplasia (cleidocranial dysostosis); general summary, S Afr Med J, 25, 475
  71. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00157-X · DOI
  72. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_4 · DOI
  73. 10.1017/CBO9780511565298 · DOI
  74. 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107501.x · DOI
  75. 10.1002/ajpa.1330570405 · DOI
  76. 10.1073/pnas.0605563103 · DOI
  77. 10.1126/science.1121144 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/378024a0 · DOI
  79. Schwartz JH, 2002, The human fossil record, vol. 1: terminology and craniodental morphology of genus Homo (Europe)
  80. Rougier H, 2006, Lower third premolar rotation in the krapina dental sample, Periodicum Biol, 108, 269
  81. 10.1006/jasc.1993.1012 · DOI
  82. 10.1038/338756a0 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/0047-2484(88)90063-2 · DOI
  84. 10.1002/gea.1017 · DOI
  85. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0334 · DOI
  86. 10.1038/nature02927 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1525/bio.2009.59.8.7 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00267.x · DOI
  89. 10.1093/molbev/msl160 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.12.006 · DOI
  92. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04333.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ackermann, R. R.
Venue
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
258-270
ISSN
  • 1060-1538
  • 1520-6505
DOI
10.1002/evan.20288
Cited by
81
References
5
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 71 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review