The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of combined intervention programmes for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: This study reviews the evidence for effects of combined intervention programmes for both the informal caregiver and the person with dementia. Method: Systematic review. Electronic databases and key articles were searched for effect studies of combined programmes, published between January 1992 and February 2005. The resulting 52 reports were scored according to set inclusion criteria. Results: Twenty five reports relating to 22 programmes met the inclusion criteria. Various aspects of caregivers' mental health and burden were studied. Best results were obtained regarding general mental health. Other aspects often showed modest and varying results. Caregivers' competence was less often addressed. The effects on the cognitive and physical functioning, behavioural problems and survival of the persons with dementia were modest and inconsistent, whereas their mental health is positively affected and admittance to long stay care is often delayed. Conclusion: Combined programmes may improve some, not all, aspects of functioning for caregiver and person with dementia. Care professionals must define their programme goals and target groups before advising their clients on a combined programme. Research may focus on the effects of programmes that were introduced fairly recently and on subgroups of caregivers (female caregivers, depressed caregivers and people with dementia, and minorities). Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta‐Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions for Caregivers of People with Dementia
Brodaty, H., Green, A., & Koschera, A. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00210.x · Cited by 952
Depressive disorders in caregivers of dementia patients: A systematic review
Cuijpers, P. (2005) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860500090078 · Cited by 414
Gitlin, L. N., Winter, L., Corcoran, M., Dennis, M. P., Schinfeld, S., & Hauck, W. W. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.4.532 · Cited by 271
Effect of a training programme to reduce stress in carers of patients with dementia.
Brodaty, H., & Gresham, M. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.299.6712.1375 · Cited by 259
Cited by
A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving
Gilhooly, K. J., Gilhooly, M. L. M., Sullivan, M. P., McIntyre, A., Wilson, L., Harding, E., Woodbridge, R., & Crutch, S. (2016) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8 · Cited by 410
Zucchella, C., Sinforiani, E., Tamburin, S., Federico, A., Mantovani, E., Bernini, S., Casale, R., & Bartolo, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01058 · Cited by 297
“Actually, some systematic reviews demonstrated that multicomponent interventions were more effective than single activities in improving general well-being of both persons with dementia and their caregivers (70, 175), and in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment (176, 177).”
BackgroundCheng, S.-T., & Zhang, F. (2020) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01547-2 · Cited by 166
A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve cancer caregiver quality of life
Waldron, E. A., Janke, E. A., Bechtel, C. F., Ramirez, M., & Cohen, A. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3118 · Cited by 147
McLaren, A. N., LaMantia, M. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2013) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.781121 · Cited by 103
Van Mierlo, L. D., Meiland, F. J. M., Van der Roest, H. G., & Dröes, R. (2012) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2694 · Cited by 94
Self-citationScott, J. L., Dawkins, S., Quinn, M. G., Sanderson, K., Elliott, K.-E. J., Stirling, C., Schüz, B., & Robinson, A. (2016) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1040724 · Cited by 77
Bennett, H. Q., Norton, S., Bunn, F., Robinson, L., Rait, G., Goodman, C., Brayne, C., & Matthews, F. E. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1105-8 · Cited by 55
The burden perceived by informal caregivers of the elderly in Saudi Arabia
Alshammari, S., Alzahrani, A., Alabduljabbar, K., Aldaghri, A., Alhusainy, Y., Khan, M., Alshuwaier, R., & Kariz, I. (2017) · Journal of Family and Community Medicine · doi:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_117_16 · Cited by 45
Kraijo, H., Brouwer, W., de Leeuw, R., Schrijvers, G., & van Exel, J. (2014) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-132420 · Cited by 42
Bartels, S. L., van Knippenberg, R. J. M., Köhler, S., Ponds, R. W., Myin-Germeys, I., Verhey, F. R. J., & de Vugt, M. E. (2020) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2019.1647130 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Smits, C. H. M., de Lange, J., Dröes, R., Meiland, F., Vernooij‐Dassen, M., & Pot, A. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-24
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1181-1193
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2160954114
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
