Cited by 94Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Personalised caregiver support: effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in subgroups of caregivers of people with dementia

Van Mierlo, Lisa D., Meiland, Franka J. M., Van der Roest, Henriëtte G., Dröes, Rose‐Marie·2012·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Insight into the characteristics of caregivers for whom psychosocial interventions are effective is important for care practice. Until now no systematic reviews were conducted into the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for caregiver subgroups. Methods: To gain insight into this relationship between caregiver subgroups and intervention outcomes, a first review study was done. This study reviews the personal characteristics of caregivers of people with dementia for whom psychosocial interventions were effective. Results: Electronic databases and key articles were searched for reviews on psychosocial interventions for caregivers studies published between January 1990 and February 2008. Based on these reviews, twenty‐six studies met the inclusion criteria (i.e. having positive outcomes described in subgroups). Most positive effects were found in caregivers of people with a diagnosis of ‘dementia not otherwise specified’ and in the subgroup of female caregivers. Examples of outcomes were decreased depression and improved self‐efficacy. Conclusions: This study gives a first overview of successful psychosocial interventions in subgroups of caregivers of people with dementia. It makes clear that until now, relatively little research has been done into subgroups of these caregivers. It also suggests that more research is needed to better understand which psychosocial interventions are effective for specific subgroups of caregivers of people with dementia. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.2694

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small sample size limited our ability to investigate possible individual differences such as severity of dementia, living status, and the relationship to the individual with dementia.

    “This limited our ability to investigate possible individual differences such as severity of dementia, living status, and the relationship to the individual with dementia, all of which may influence individuals' responsiveness to an intervention [36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Mierlo, L. D., Meiland, F. J. M., Van der Roest, H. G., & Dröes, R.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Dröes, Rose‐Marie
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1999570792
Cited by
94
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia caregivers, psychosocial interventions, intervention effectiveness, caregiver depression, caregiver self-efficacy, women caregivers, individualized support
MeSH terms
Counseling, Dementia, Humans, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Respite Care, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review