Cited by 91Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Who worries most? Worry prevalence and patterns across the lifespan

Gonçalves, Daniela C., Byrne, Gerard J.·2013·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To examine the age‐related worry patterns in a population‐based sample of self‐reported worriers. Methods: The National Survey of Mental Health and Well‐Being is a multistage stratified epidemiologic survey of mental health conducted in Australia in 2007. Participants were surveyed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. All participants who reported a period of pervasive worry were included in this study (N = 3735, 16–85 years of age, 61% female). Results: Compared with younger adults (16–29 years of age; N = 860), older adults (65–85 years of age; N = 639) reported fewer worries [odds ratio (OR) = 0.36, p < 0.01] and a lower likelihood of worrying about interpersonal relations (OR = 0.66, p < 0.01), health (OR = 0.65, p < 0.05), work (OR = 0.39, p < 0.01), and miscellaneous topics (OR = 0.57, p < 0.01), but a higher likelihood of worrying about the health and welfare of loved ones (OR = 2.46, p < 0.01) after adjusting for socio‐demographic and clinical factors. Similar patterns were seen in older persons with and without a lifetime history of generalized anxiety disorder as diagnosed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Conclusions: The findings indicated an overall decrease in worry count with advancing age, as well as a developmental distribution of worry content, and a quantitative but not qualitative distinction between normal and pathological worriers. Overall, these findings might contribute to the understanding of worry processes and the phenomenology of generalized anxiety disorder in older cohorts. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.3788

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonçalves, D. C., & Byrne, G. J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Gonçalves, Daniela C.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-28
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
41-49
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1533473163
Cited by
91
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
age differences, lifespan development, generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, health worry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Age Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review