Cited by 231Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A taxometric investigation of the latent structure of worry.

Ruscio, Ayelet Meron, Borkovec, T. D., Ruscio, John·2001·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Researchers have described 2 types of worriers, normal and pathological, who differ in the frequency, intensity, and controllability of their worry experiences. Although normal and pathological worry are generally treated as separate though related phenomena, no study has tested for separateness against the alternative hypothesis that all worry exists along a single dimension. In the present study, worry ratings of 1,588 college students were submitted to taxometric procedures designed to evaluate latent structure. Results provided evidence for the dimensionality of worry. These findings suggest that generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), whose central feature is worry, may also be quantitatively rather than qualitatively different from normal functioning. The authors argue that a focus on normal and pathological extremes has constrained the study of worry phenomena and that dimensional conceptualization of worry may significantly enhance understanding of both worry and GAD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.110.3.413

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies show a continuum of worry when groups with different degrees of mental disorder are examined.

    “Ruscio et al. [2001] konnten zeigen, dass sich ein Kontinuum der Sorgen ergibt, wenn psychisch unterschiedlich stark gestörte Gruppen untersucht werden.”

    From Wann sind Sorgen pathologisch? (2009) · cites this paper as Ruscio et al. [2001]

  • The Penn State Worry Questionnaire cannot satisfactorily distinguish clinical from everyday worries.

    “zwischen klinischen und alltäglichen Sorgen vermag das Verfahren nicht befriedigend zu trennen [Ruscio et al., 2001;Verkuil et al., 2007].”

    From Wann sind Sorgen pathologisch? (2009) · cites this paper as Ruscio et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruscio, A. M., Borkovec, T. D., & Ruscio, J.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Elizabethtown College (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2001-08
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
413-422
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2108234210
Cited by
231
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-12675-01, MH-58593, R01MH058593, F31MH012675)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
worry, generalized anxiety disorder, taxometric analysis, latent structure, university students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Population Surveillance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review