Cited by 79Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being Studies

Effects of transient and chronic loneliness on major depression in older adults: A longitudinal study

Martín‐María, Natalia, Caballero, Francisco F., Lara, Elvira, Domènech‐Abella, Joan, Haro, Josep M., Olaya, Beatriz, Ayuso‐Mateos, José L., Miret, Marta·2021·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: The number of older adults is rapidly rising globally. Loneliness is a common problem that can deteriorate health. The aims of this work were to identify different types of loneliness (transient and chronic) and to assess their association with depression over time. Methods: A nationally representative sample from the Spanish population comprising 1190 individuals aged 50+ years was interviewed on three evaluations over a 7‐year period. The UCLA Loneliness Scale was used to measure loneliness. While chronic loneliness was defined as the presence of loneliness across all three waves, transient loneliness expressed the presence of loneliness in one wave only. A 12‐month major depressive episode was assessed at each interview. After confirming the cross‐sectional relationship, a multilevel mixed‐effects model was used to examine the association between loneliness and depression. Results: Almost a quarter of individuals felt lonely and one out of 10 presented depression at baseline. Of the sample, 22.78% showed transient loneliness, while 6.72% presented the chronic type. People experiencing chronic loneliness were at a higher risk of presenting major depression (OR = 6.11; 95% CI = 2.62, 14.22) than those presenting transient loneliness (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.19, 4.14). This association varied over time and was stronger at the first follow‐up than at the second one. Conclusions: Focusing on loneliness prevention could reduce the risk of depression. Chronic loneliness is a public health problem that should be addressed through the full participation of the political, social, and medical sectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.5397

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martín‐María, N., Caballero, F. F., Lara, E., Domènech‐Abella, J., Haro, J. M., Olaya, B., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., & Miret, M.
Affiliations
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Corresponding author
Ayuso‐Mateos, José L.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
76-85
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W3049055525
Cited by
79
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund (PI12/01490, PI13/00059, PI16/00177, PI16/00218, PI16/01073)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
loneliness, chronic loneliness, major depressive disorder, older adults, depression risk, longitudinal associations, loneliness prevention, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review