Cited by 79Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Predicting stability and change in loneliness in later life

Open access
Newall, Nancy E. G., Chipperfield, Judith G., Bailis, Daniel S.·2014·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

This study examined potential discriminators of groups of older adults showing different patterns of stability or change in loneliness over 5 years: those who became lonely, overcame loneliness, were persistently lonely, and were persistently not lonely. Discriminant function analysis results showed that the persistently lonely, compared with the persistently not lonely, were more often living alone, widowed, and experiencing poorer health and perceived control. Moreover, changes in living arrangements and perceived control predicted loneliness change. In conclusion, perceiving that one is able to meet social needs is a predictor of loneliness and loneliness change and appears to be more important than people’s friendships. Because the predictors were better able to predict entry into loneliness, results point to the promise of prevention approaches to loneliness interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407513494951

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who live alone may have less frequent opportunity for social contact, may be more isolated, and may feel more lonely than those who live with others, which may result in reduced cognitive stimulation and lower cognitive reserve.

    “Individuals who live alone may have less frequent opportunity for social contact, may be more isolated (Carstensen, 1992;de Jong Gierveld & Havens, 2004;de Jong Gierveld, 2003;Kobayashi et al., 2009), and may feel more lonely (Newall et al., 2014;Victor et al., 2005) than those who live with others, which may result in reduced cognitive stimulation and lower cognitive reserve (Gow et al., 2007).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Newall et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Solano CH. Loneliness and perceptions of control: General trait versus specific attribution. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1987;2:201–214. [Google Scholar]
  2. Statistics Canada. Age, sex, marital status, and common-law status. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: 1996. Catalogue No. 92-353-XIE. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newall, N. E. G., Chipperfield, J. G., & Bailis, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Newall, Nancy E. G.
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2013-07-26
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
335-351
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2018540803
Cited by
79
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (42790_1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, predictors of loneliness, living alone, widowhood, perceived control, social needs, loneliness prevention, friendship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review