Cited by 61International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact

International Joint Ventures as Boundary Spanners: Technological Knowledge Transfer in an Emerging Economy

Open access
Khan, Zaheer, Lew, Yong Kyu, Sinkovics, Rudolf R.·2015·Global Strategy Journal

Abstract

We investigate how international joint ventures (IJV s) established in emerging economies help their local suppliers with technological knowledge transfer. Data from 50 Pakistani‐owned T ier 1 suppliers, three of the major assemblers, and policy makers in the M inistry of I ndustries and P roduction in P akistan is collected. Findings suggest that, in the context of the P akistani emerging economy, IJV s can also play a critical role as the boundary spanners of knowledge transfer. Local suppliers are linked with their global suppliers' networks through associational learning. Social capital between the IJV s and the local component suppliers and the IJV s' willingness to initiate a knowledge transfer dialogue among local and global T ier 1 suppliers are critically important factors that enable this transfer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gsj.1089

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local firms are more likely to acquire technological know-how and develop new capabilities by participating in geographically dispersed rather than locally oriented networks.

    “Similarly, Khan, Lew and Sinkovics's (2015) study of the Pakistani automotive industry shows that local firms are more likely to acquire technological know-how and develop new capabilities by participating in geographically dispersed rather than locally oriented networks.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Khan, Lew and Sinkovics, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 137 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Davenport TH, Prusak L. 1998. Working Knowledge: Man- aging What Your Organization Knows. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  2. Dyer J, Nobeoka K. 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 345-367.
  3. Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA, Tsang EWK. 2008. Interorganizational knowledge transfer: current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies 45(4): 667-690.
  4. Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK. 2005. Networks, social capital, and learning. Academy of Management Review 30(1): 146-165.
  5. Kale P, Singh H, Perlumutter H. 2000. Learning and pro- tection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: build- ing relational capital. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 217-237.
  6. Kast FE, Rosenzweig JE. 1970. Organization and Manage- ment Theory: A Systems Approach. McGraw-Hill: New York
  7. Malik T. 2012. Disparate association between alliance social capital and the global pharmaceutical firms' per- formance. International Business Review 21(6): 1017- 1028.
  8. March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations. Wiley: New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Sinkovics, R. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Sejong University (KR)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Sinkovics, Rudolf R.
Venue
Global Strategy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-19
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
48-68
ISSN
  • 2042-5791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-5805
OpenAlex
W1515800131
Cited by
61
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Strategy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Keywords
international joint ventures, boundary spanners, technology transfer, local suppliers, first-tier suppliers, component suppliers, social capital, emerging markets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review