The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data
Open accessAbstract
The ultimate goal of brain connectivity studies is to propose, test, modify, and compare certain directional brain pathways. Path analysis or structural equation modeling (SEM) is an ideal statistical method for such studies. In this work, we propose a two‐stage unified SEM plus GLM (General Linear Model) approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series data with subject‐level covariates. In Stage 1, we analyze the fMRI multivariate time series for each subject individually via a unified SEM model by combining longitudinal pathways represented by a multivariate autoregressive (MAR) model, and contemporaneous pathways represented by a conventional SEM. In Stage 2, the resulting subject‐level path coefficients are merged with subject‐level covariates such as gender, age, IQ, etc., to examine the impact of these covariates on effective connectivity via a GLM. Our approach is exemplified via the analysis of an fMRI visual attention experiment. Furthermore, the significant path network from the unified SEM analysis is compared to that from a conventional SEM analysis without incorporating the longitudinal information as well as that from a Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) approach. Hum. Brain Mapp, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Variation in the connection weights of specific connections between two given ROIs has long been a focal point of fMRI research [17].”
From Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Unified SEM contains both lagged and contemporaneous directed relations among regions, making it ideal for biological systems that likely contain these effects as detailed in [18].”
From Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Support for this notion is found in fMRI data, where individual differences in brain patterns relating to indices such as performance [17], [52] and gender [13] have been found in normative samples.”
From Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118619179 · Cited by 17,944
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
Self-citationTesting Structural Equation Models.
Clogg, C. C., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580595 · Cited by 8,246
LISREL 7 : user's reference guide
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,783
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis
John, C. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,120
Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.
Browne, M. (1984) · British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x · Cited by 1,890
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bentler PM, 1992, EQS structural equation program manual
- Bentler PM, 2002, EQS6 for Windows user's guide
- Lange N, 1999, Functional MRI (Medical Radiology/Diagnostic Imaging), 301
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research
Fisher, A. J., Medaglia, J. D., & Jeronimus, B. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711978115 · Cited by 1,099
Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI
Rogers, B. P., Morgan, V. L., Newton, A. T., & Gore, J. C. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.03.007 · Cited by 511
Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026 · Cited by 478
Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017915 · Cited by 435
A complex network perspective on clinical science
Hofmann, S. G., Curtiss, J., & McNally, R. J. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616639283 · Cited by 366
An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia.
Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0027543 · Cited by 320
Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data
Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116648209 · Cited by 293
Personalized Models of Psychopathology
Wright, A. G. C., & Woods, W. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-102419-125032 · Cited by 308
Estimation of a Structural Vector Autoregression Model Using Non-Gaussianity
Hyvärinen, A., Zhang, K., Shimizu, S., & Hoyer, P. O. (2010) · doi:10.5555/1756006.1859907 · Cited by 259
Sideridis, G., Simos, P., Papanicolaou, A., & Fletcher, J. (2014) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164414525397 · Cited by 246
Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data
Deshpande, G., LaConte, S., James, G. A., Peltier, S., & Hu, X. P. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20606 · Cited by 238
A simple view of the brain through a frequency-specific functional connectivity measure
Salvador, R., Martínez, A., Pomarol-Clotet, E., Gomar, J., Vila, F., Sarró, S., Capdevila, A., & Bullmore, E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.018 · Cited by 225
Partial Granger causality—Eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables
Guo, S., Seth, A. K., Kendrick, K. M., Zhou, C., & Feng, J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.011 · Cited by 205
Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117 · Cited by 171
Investigating the biological and clinical significance of human dysbioses
Frank, D. N., Zhu, W., Sartor, R. B., & Li, E. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.06.005 · Cited by 182
Self-citationFoundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy
Piccirillo, M. L., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.002 · Cited by 160
Lu, C., Peng, D., Chen, C., Ning, N., Ding, G., Li, K., Yang, Y., & Lin, C. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.017 · Cited by 178
Beltz, A. M., & Gates, K. M. (2017) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1373014 · Cited by 175
Jordan, D. G., Winer, E. S., & Salem, T. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22957 · Cited by 166
Neural changes underlying successful second language word learning: An fMRI study
Yang, J., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Li, P. (2014) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.09.004 · Cited by 155
Effective connectivity of a reward network in obese women
Stoeckel, L. E., Kim, J., Weller, R. E., Cox, J. E., Cook, E. W., & Horwitz, B. (2009) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.05.016 · Cited by 147
Self-citationDeshpande, G., & Hu, X. P. (2012) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0091 · Cited by 144
Zotev, V. S., Phillips, R., Young, K. D., Drevets, W. C., & Bodurka, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079184 · Cited by 151
Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data.
Lane, S., Gates, K. M., Pike, H., Beltz, A. M., & Wright, A. G. C. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000192 · Cited by 136
Unsupervised Classification During Time-Series Model Building
Gates, K. M., Lane, S., Varangis, E. M. L., Giovanello, K. S., & Guiskewicz, K. (2016) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1256187 · Cited by 145
Brain Networks of Explicit and Implicit Learning
Yang, J., & Li, P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042993 · Cited by 111
Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data
Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., & Slobounov, S. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051 · Cited by 125
Craggs, J. G., Price, D. D., Verne, G. N., Perlstein, W. M., & Robinson, M. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.057 · Cited by 133
Yarkoni, T., & Braver, T. S. (2010) · Plenum series on human exceptionality · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_6 · Cited by 145
Tiego, J., Martin, E. A., DeYoung, C. G., Hagan, K. E., Cooper, S. E., Pasion, R., Satchell, L. P., Shackman, A. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Fornito, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-023-00057-5 · Cited by 122
Second language lexical development and cognitive control: A longitudinal fMRI study.
Grant, A., Fang, S.-Y., & Li, P. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.010 · Cited by 92
Parsing Heterogeneity in the Brain Connectivity of Depressed and Healthy Adults During Positive Mood
Price, R. B., Lane, S., Gates, K., Kraynak, T. E., Horner, M. S., Thase, M. E., & Siegle, G. J. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023 · Cited by 106
Wright, A. G. C., Gates, K. M., Arizmendi, C., Lane, S., Woods, W. C., & Edershile, E. A. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000617 · Cited by 113
Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091322 · Cited by 107
Chen, G., Glen, D., Saad, Z. S., Hamilton, J. P., Thomason, M. E., Gotlib, I. H., & Cox, R. W. (2011) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.09.004 · Cited by 107
Data-Driven Subgroups in Depression Derived from Directed Functional Connectivity Paths at Rest
Price, R. B., Gates, K., Kraynak, T. E., Thase, M. E., & Siegle, G. J. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.97 · Cited by 98
Inventory management, managerial competence and financial performance of small businesses
Orobia, L. A., Nakibuuka, J., Bananuka, J., & Akisimire, R. (2020) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-07-2019-0147 · Cited by 135
Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: A comparison of group-analysis methods
Li, J., Wang, Z. J., Palmer, S. J., & McKeown, M. J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.068 · Cited by 89
Connectivity analysis is essential to understand neurological disorders
Rowe, J. B. (2010) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00144 · Cited by 92
State Space Modeling in an Open Source, Modular, Structural Equation Modeling Environment
Hunter, M. D. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1369354 · Cited by 94
Uncovering Interactions in the Frequency Domain
Guo, S., Wu, J., Ding, M., & Feng, J. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000087 · Cited by 83
Systems Methods for Developmental Research
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy117 · Cited by 80
Marrelec, G., Kim, J. J. H., Doyon, J., & Horwitz, B. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20555 · Cited by 79
Self-citationMorawetz, C., Alexandrowicz, R. W., & Heekeren, H. R. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000215 · Cited by 83
Semantic association investigated with functional MRI and independent component analysis
Kim, K. K., Karunanayaka, P., Privitera, M., Holland, S. K., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2011) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.11.010 · Cited by 79
Using Raw VAR Regression Coefficients to Build Networks can be Misleading
Bulteel, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Brose, A., & Ceulemans, E. (2016) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1150151 · Cited by 75
Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network
Hillary, F. G., Medaglia, J. D., Gates, K., Molenaar, P. C., Slocomb, J., Peechatka, A., & Good, D. C. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr043 · Cited by 74
Automated Selection of Robust Individual-Level Structural Equation Models for Time Series Data
Lane, S., & Gates, K. M. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1309978 · Cited by 69
Functional Imaging of Autonomic Regulation: Methods and Key Findings
Macey, P. M., Ogren, J. A., Kumar, R., & Harper, R. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00513 · Cited by 81
Interactive brains, social minds
Sänger, J., Lindenberger, U., & Müller, V. (2011) · Communicative & Integrative Biology · doi:10.4161/cib.17934 · Cited by 71
Wright, A. G. C., Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Simms, L. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01914 · Cited by 87
Brain network reconfiguration for language and domain-general cognitive control in bilinguals
Wu, J., Yang, J., Chen, M., Li, S., Zhang, Z., Kang, C., Ding, G., & Guo, T. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.022 · Cited by 72
Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects
Hyvärinen, A., Shimizu, S., & Hoyer, P. O. (2008) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390210 · Cited by 68
Wittenborn, A. K., Liu, T., Ridenour, T. A., Lachmar, E. M., Mitchell, E. A., & Seedall, R. B. (2018) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12350 · Cited by 68
Functional Neuroimaging in Traumatic Brain Injury: From Nodes to Networks
Medaglia, J. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00407 · Cited by 63
Mild cognitive impairment and fMRI studies of brain functional connectivity: the state of the art
Farràs-Permanyer, L., Guàrdia‐Olmos, J., & Peró, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01095 · Cited by 63
The role of large-scale neural interactions for developmental stuttering
Lu, C., Ning, N., Peng, D., Ding, G., Li, K., Yang, Y., & Lin, C. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.020 · Cited by 67
Sanford, B. T., Ciarrochi, J., Hofmann, S. G., Chin, F. T., Gates, K. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.05.006 · Cited by 62
Rashid, M. U., Singh, H., & Goyal, V. (2020) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.12644 · Cited by 64
Data driven pathway analysis and forecast of global warming and sea level rise
Song, J., Tong, G., Chao, J., Chung, J., Zhang, M., Lin, W., Zhang, T., Bentler, P. M., & Zhu, W. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30789-4 · Cited by 60
Self-citationDima, D., Jogia, J., & Frangou, S. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22382 · Cited by 60
A Survey on Brain Effective Connectivity Network Learning
Ji, J., Zou, A., Liu, J., Yang, C., Zhang, X., & Song, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3106299 · Cited by 57
Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective
Cooper, S. R., Jackson, J. J., Barch, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022 · Cited by 65
Kim, J., & Horwitz, B. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.10.011 · Cited by 56
Self-citationKarunanayaka, P., Eslinger, P. J., Wang, J., Weitekamp, C. W., Molitoris, S., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Yang, Q. X. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22312 · Cited by 54
Hofmans, J., Clercq, B. J. D., Kuppens, P., Verbeke, L., & Widiger, T. A. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000562 · Cited by 52
Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: Data Standards and Statistical Considerations
Huie, J. R., Mondello, S., Lindsell, C. J., Antiga, L., Yuh, E. L., Zanier, E. R., Masson, S., Rosario, B. L., Ferguson, A. R., Adeoye, O. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2019.6762 · Cited by 53
Multi-area neural mass modeling of EEG and MEG signals
Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., & Hamid Soltanian-zadeh, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.034 · Cited by 50
Methods for Quantifying Patterns of Dynamic Interactions in Dyads
Gates, K. M., & Liu, S. (2016) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191116641508 · Cited by 50
Woods, W. C., Arizmendi, C., Gates, K. M., Stepp, S. D., Pilkonis, P. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000472 · Cited by 48
Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME
Henry, T. R., Feczko, E., Cordova, M., Earl, E., Williams, S., Nigg, J. T., Fair, D. A., & Gates, K. M. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.040 · Cited by 50
Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs).
Gates, K. M., Fisher, Z. F., & Bollen, K. A. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000229 · Cited by 50
Dealing with Multiple Solutions in Structural Vector Autoregressive Models
Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1151333 · Cited by 45
Insights from Personalized Models of Brain and Behavior for Identifying Biomarkers in PsychiatryPreprint
Kraus, B. T., Zinbarg, R. E., Braga, R. M., Nusslock, R., Mittal, V. A., & Gratton, C. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105259 · Cited by 48
Chen, L., Goucha, T., Männel, C., Friederici, A. D., & Zaccarella, E. (2021) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25432 · Cited by 39
A neuroimaging study of semantic representation in first and second languages
Zhang, X., Yang, J., Wang, R., & Li, P. (2020) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1738509 · Cited by 46
Analyzing relationships among ARMA processes based on non-Gaussianity of external influences
Kawahara, Y., Shimizu, S., & Washio, T. (2011) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.02.008 · Cited by 41
Iyer, S., Izhak Shafran, J., Grayson, D. S., Gates, K. M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.054 · Cited by 41
Zelle, S. L., Gates, K. M., Fiez, J. A., Sayette, M. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.015 · Cited by 40
Zheng, Y., Wiebe, R. P., Cleveland, H. H., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Harris, K. S. (2013) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.763012 · Cited by 39
Zhang, J., Li, X., Li, C., Lian, Z., Huang, X., Zhong, G., Zhu, D., Li, K., Jin, C., Hu, X., et al. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22404 · Cited by 39
de Marco, G., Vrignaud, P., Destrieux, C., de Marco, D., Testelin, S., Devauchelle, B., & Berquin, P. C. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.003 · Cited by 38
Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models
Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Millner, A. J., Wang, S. B., Arizmendi, C., Bentley, K. H., DeMarco, D., Fortgang, R. G., Zuromski, K. L., Maimone, J. S., et al. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104574 · Cited by 43
Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., Engels, A. S., Molenaar, P. C. M., Pulido, C., Turrisi, R., Berenbaum, S. A., Gilmore, R. O., & Wilson, S. J. (2013) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.023 · Cited by 36
The challenge of non-ergodicity in network neuroscience
Medaglia, J. D., Ramanathan, D. M., Venkatesan, U. M., & Hillary, F. G. (2011) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.639604 · Cited by 35
Beltz, A. M., Beekman, C. R., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Buss, K. A. (2013) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2013.805953 · Cited by 36
Elbich, D., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Scherf, K. S. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24546 · Cited by 35
Kim, J., & Horwitz, B. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.006 · Cited by 34
Self-citationKarunanayaka, P., Kim, K. K., Holland, S. K., & Szaflarski, J. P. (2011) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.029 · Cited by 33
Dotterer, H. L., Beltz, A. M., Foster, K. T., Simms, L. J., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719002563 · Cited by 34
Rapidly acquired multisensory association in the olfactory cortex
Karunanayaka, P., Wilson, D. A., Vasavada, M. M., Wang, J., Martinez, B., Tobia, M. J., Kong, L., Eslinger, P. J., & Yang, Q. X. (2015) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.390 · Cited by 32
Huntington's disease: Brain imaging in Huntington's disease
Johnson, E. B., & Gregory, S. (2019) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.04.004 · Cited by 35
Learning Discriminative Bayesian Networks from High-Dimensional Continuous Neuroimaging Data
Zhou, L., Wang, L., Liu, L., Ogunbona, P., & Shen, D. G. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2511754 · Cited by 33
Nichols, T. T., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Wilson, S. J. (2013) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12060 · Cited by 29
Jung, K., Takane, Y., Hwang, H., & Woodward, T. S. (2012) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9284-2 · Cited by 29
Causal search procedures for fMRI: review and suggestions
Henry, T. R., & Gates, K. M. (2016) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-016-0010-8 · Cited by 28
From persons to general principles: Methodological decisions for idiographic and nomothetic research
Kuper, N., Andresen, P. K., Beck, E. D., Costantini, G., Hamaker, E. L., Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmermann, J. (2024) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070241278020 · Cited by 34
Unsupervised classification reveals consistency and degeneracy in neural network patterns of emotion
Doyle, C. M., Lane, S., Brooks, J. A., Wilkins, R. W., Gates, K. M., & Lindquist, K. A. (2022) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsac028 · Cited by 30
Carrig, M. M., Kolden, G. G., & Strauman, T. J. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300902735864 · Cited by 26
A Tutorial on Estimating Time-Varying Vector Autoregressive Models
Haslbeck, J. M. B., Bringmann, L. F., & Waldorp, L. (2020) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2020.1743630 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P. M., & Ernst, T.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-93
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871502
- OpenAlex
- W2118791853
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (2 P30 AG08051-11, P30AG008051)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24DA016170, DA01070, DA-00017, K02DA016991, P01DA001070)
- National Center for Research Resources (3M01 RR0101710-06S1)
- Biological and Environmental Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- structural equation modeling, functional MRI, brain connectivity, effective connectivity, multivariate autoregressive model, path analysis, visual attention, dynamic causal modeling, multivariate time series
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review