Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heritability of “small‐world” networks in the brain: A graph theoretical analysis of resting‐state EEG functional connectivity

Open access
Smit, Dirk J. A., Stam, Cornelis J., Posthuma, Danielle, Boomsma, Dorret I., de Geus, Eco J. C.·2008·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that resting‐state functional networks as studied with fMRI, EEG, and MEG may be so‐called small‐world networks. We investigated to what extent the characteristic features of small‐world networks are genetically determined. To represent functional connectivity between brain areas, we measured resting EEG in 574 twins and their siblings and calculated the synchronization likelihood between each pair of electrodes. We applied a threshold to obtain a binary graph from which we calculated the clustering coefficient C (describing local interconnectedness) and average path length L (describing global interconnectedness) for each individual. Modeling of MZ and DZ twin and sibling resemblance indicated that across various frequency bands 46–89% of the individual differences in C and 37–62% of the individual differences in L are heritable. It is asserted that C, L, and a small‐world organization are viable markers of genetic differences in brain organization. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20468

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Smit, D. J. A., Stam, C. J., Posthuma, D., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. C.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-06
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1368-1378
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2107612402
Cited by
275
References
7
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.