Cited by 114Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPsychedelics and Drug Studies

Effects of morphine and alcohol on functional brain connectivity during “resting state”: a placebo-controlled crossover study in healthy young men

Open access
Khalili‐Mahani, Najmeh, Zoethout, Remco M.W., Beckmann, Christian F., Baerends, Evelinda, de Kam, Marieke L., Soeter, Roelof P., Dahan, Albert, van Buchem, Mark A. +2 more·2012·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

A major challenge in central nervous system (CNS) drug research is to develop a generally applicable methodology for repeated measurements of drug effects on the entire CNS, without task-related interactions and a priori models. For this reason, data-driven resting-state fMRI methods are promising for pharmacological research. This study aimed to investigate whether different psychoactive substances cause drug-specific effects in functional brain connectivity during resting-state. In this double blind placebo-controlled (double dummy) crossover study, seven resting-state fMRI scans were obtained in 12 healthy young men in three different drug sessions (placebo, morphine and alcohol; randomized). Drugs were administered intravenously based on validated pharmacokinetic protocols to minimize the inter- and intra-subject variance in plasma drug concentrations. Dual-regression was used to estimate whole-brain resting-state connectivity in relation to eight well-characterized resting-state networks, for each data set. A mixed effects analysis of drug by time interactions revealed dissociable changes in both pharmacodynamics and functional connectivity resulting from alcohol and morphine. Post hoc analysis of regions of interest revealed adaptive network interactions in relation to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic curves. Our results illustrate the applicability of resting-state functional brain connectivity in CNS drug research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21265

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resting state fMRI could be useful for 'finger-printing' different pharmacological agents within the same individual's brain.

    “This indicates that resting state fMRI could be useful for ''finger-printing'' different pharmacological agents within the same individual's brain (Khalili-Mahani et al., 2012) as well as for studying differential pharmacological effects in individuals with different backgrounds.”
  • Different drugs produce specific and detectable changes in resting state networks.

    “In addition, it has been shown that different drugs produce specific and detectable changes in these resting state networks (Khalili-Mahani et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bond A, Lader M. ( 1974): Use of analog scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47( Sep): 211–218. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khalili‐Mahani, N., Zoethout, R. M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Baerends, E., de Kam, M. L., Soeter, R. P., Dahan, A., van Buchem, M. A., van Gerven, J. M. A., & Rombouts, S. A. R. B.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1003-1018
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2123055367
Cited by
114
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Keywords
morphine, alcohol, resting-state functional connectivity, resting-state fMRI, psychoactive substances, dual regression, resting-state networks, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug effects on the brain, healthy young men
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ethanol, Brain, Brain Mapping, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Morphine, Nerve Net, Rest, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review