Cited by 63Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging: The coordinated use of multiple, mutually informative probes to understand brain structure and function

Open access
Hao, Xuejun, Xu, Dongrong, Bansal, Ravi, Dong, Zhengchao, Liu, Jun, Wang, Zhishun, Kangarlu, Alayar, Liu, Feng +4 more·2013·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Differing imaging modalities provide unique channels of information to probe differing aspects of the brain's structural or functional organization. In combination, differing modalities provide complementary and mutually informative data about tissue organization that is more than their sum. We acquired and spatially coregistered data in four MRI modalities--anatomical MRI, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)--from 20 healthy adults to understand how interindividual variability in measures from one modality account for variability in measures from other modalities at each voxel of the brain. We detected significant correlations of local volumes with the magnitude of functional activation, suggesting that underlying variation in local volumes contributes to individual variability in functional activation. We also detected significant inverse correlations of NAA (a putative measure of neuronal density and viability) with volumes of white matter in the frontal cortex, with DTI-based measures of tissue organization within the superior longitudinal fasciculus, and with the magnitude of functional activation and default-mode activity during simple visual and motor tasks, indicating that substantial variance in local volumes, white matter organization, and functional activation derives from an underlying variability in the number or density of neurons in those regions. Many of these imaging measures correlated with measures of intellectual ability within differing brain tissues and differing neural systems, demonstrating that the neural determinants of intellectual capacity involve numerous and disparate features of brain tissue organization, a conclusion that could be made with confidence only when imaging the same individuals with multiple MRI modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21440

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both brain structure and function may serve as susceptibility mechanisms.

    “Thus, both brain structure and function, which may interrelate and whose development inform each other (Hao et al., 2013, Honey et al., 2010, Paus, 2013, Power et al., 2010, Zielinski et al., 2010), may both serve as susceptibility mechanisms.”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Hao et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Filippi M 2009 MRI Techniques and Protocols (Neuromethods) Hamana Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, X., Xu, D., Bansal, R., Dong, Z., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Kangarlu, A., Liu, F., Duan, Y., Shova, S., Gerber, A. J., & Peterson, B. S.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-11
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
253-271
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1974103289
Cited by
63
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh074677-05)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K-02-74677)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 36197, R01MH036197, R01MH068318, MH 068318, R01MH089582, MH089582, P50MH090966, K02-MH-074677)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA027100, DA027100)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES015579, R01ES015579)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R03EB008235)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
multimodal MRI, interindividual variability, brain structure-function relationship, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, N-acetylaspartate, white matter organization, superior longitudinal fasciculus, intellectual ability, frontal cortex, neuronal density
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Algorithms, Attention, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Intelligence Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review