Cited by 113Neuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Predicting vocal emotion expressions from the human brain

Open access
Kotz, Sonja A., Kalberlah, Christian, Bahlmann, Jörg, Friederici, Angela D., Haynes, John‐D.·2013·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Speech is an important carrier of emotional information. However, little is known about how different vocal emotion expressions are recognized in a receiver's brain. We used multivariate pattern analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to investigate to which degree distinct vocal emotion expressions are represented in the receiver's local brain activity patterns. Specific vocal emotion expressions are encoded in a right fronto-operculo-temporal network involving temporal regions known to subserve suprasegmental acoustic processes and a fronto-opercular region known to support emotional evaluation, and, moreover, in left temporo-cerebellar regions covering sequential processes. The right inferior frontal region, in particular, was found to differentiate distinct emotional expressions. The present analysis reveals vocal emotion to be encoded in a shared cortical network reflected by distinct brain activity patterns. These results shed new light on theoretical and empirical controversies about the perception of distinct vocal emotion expressions at the level of large-scale human brain signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22041

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both auditory and tactile social cues rely on the involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex and insular cortex.

    “Both auditory and tactile social cues rely on the involvement of the mPFC and IC, implicated in socio-emotional and socio-salience processing [114,115].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotz, S. A., Kalberlah, C., Bahlmann, J., Friederici, A. D., & Haynes, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-27
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1971-1981
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2046102804
Cited by
113
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
vocal emotion, emotion perception, speech perception, brain activation patterns, inferior frontal cortex, affective evaluation, multivariate pattern analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Speech, Voice, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review