Cited by 890Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity

Davidson, Richard J.·2000·American Psychologist

Abstract

The brain circuitry underlying emotion includes several territories of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, and related structures. In general, the PFC represents emotion in the absence of immediately present incentives and thus plays a crucial role in the anticipation of the future affective consequences of action, as well as in the persistence of emotion following the offset of an elicitor. The functions of the other structures in this circuit are also considered. Individual differences in this circuitry are reviewed, with an emphasis on asymmetries within the PFC and activation of the amygdala as 2 key components of affective style. These individual differences are related to both behavioral and biological variables associated with affective style and emotion regulation. Plasticity in this circuitry and its implications for transforming emotion and cultivating positive affect and resilience are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.55.11.1196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If mindfulness is better characterized as a state or process, it may not be a stable quality that can be assessed as a trait variable and therefore may not relate to affective reactivity, which is proposed to reflect stable individual differences.

    “If this is indeed the case, mindfulness may not be a stable quality that can be assessed as a trait variable and therefore may not relate to affective reactivity, which is proposed to reflect stable individual differences [51].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Richard J.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2000-11
Volume
55
Issue
11
Pages
1196-1214
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W1977115078
Cited by
890
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 46
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh040747-14)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH61083, P50MH061083, P50-MH 52354, P50MH052354, MH40747, MH 43454, MH00875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
affective style, emotion regulation, resilience, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, individual differences, brain asymmetry, neuroplasticity, psychopathology, positive affect
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Humans, Individuality, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Personality, Psychopathology, Prefrontal Cortex, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review