The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A modality‐independent approach to spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain
Abstract
A modality‐independent approch for interactive spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain is described and its performance evaluated. Spatial normalization is accomplished using a nine‐parameter affine transformation to interactively align and adjust the shape of a subject brain to the reference brain detailed in the 1988 atlas of Talairach et al. A user‐friendly software application was developed using the X‐windows Motif environment to guide the user through this process. This software supports data types from a wide variety of tomographic imagers and produces output in spatially concise formats. The parameters used for spatial alignment and shape normalization are presented and methods to apply them discussed. Where normalization parameters cannot be obtained directly from the image, as with positron emission tomography (PET), methods for estimating them are given. Evaluation of a new four‐landmark method to fit the AC‐PC line in 16 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies indicated an average difference assessed as the distance between the true and fitted AC‐PC line at four locations of 0.82 mm when using a 2‐D weighted fit. The same landmarks were evaluated using lower spatial resolution PET‐like images simulated from the 16 MRI studies. The difference between the PET and MR image volumes following alignment was minimal, with mean rotational differences of less than 0.2 deg and mean translational differences of generally less than 2 mm. Spatial normalization is illustrated for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), X‐ray computed tomography (CT), PET, and MR image volumes. Modality‐independent spatial normalization can be consistently and reliably performed with the methods and software presented. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431
Cited by
Mayberg, H. S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, R. K., Jerabek, P. A., Silva, J. A., Tekell, J. L., Martin, C. C., Lancaster, J. L., et al. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.5.675 · Cited by 2,416
Self-citationIntrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain
Vincent, J. L., Patel, G. H., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Baker, J. T., Van Essen, D. C., Zempel, J. M., Snyder, L. H., Corbetta, M., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05758 · Cited by 1,786
Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations
Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Adeyemo, B., Huckins, J. F., Kelley, W. M., & Petersen, S. E. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu239 · Cited by 1,463
Functional brain networks develop from a local to distributed organization
Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Power, J. D., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Church, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381 · Cited by 1,530
Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template
Lancaster, J. L., Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez, D., Martinez, M., Salinas, F., Evans, A., Zilles, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fox, P. T. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20345 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancaster, J. L., Glass, T. G., Lankipalli, B. R., Downs, H., Mayberg, H., & Fox, P. T.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-223
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2022874681
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.