Cited by 140Motor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar activation during the learning of a visuomotor dissociation task

Flament, Didier, Ellermann, Jutta M., Kim, Seong-Gi, Uǧurbil, Kamil, Ebner, Timothy J.·1996·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

We have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the changes in cerebellar activation that occur during the acquisition of motor skill in human subjects presented with a new task. The standard paradigm consisted of a center-out movement in which subjects used a joystick to superimposed a cursor onto viusual targets. Two variations of this paradigm were introduced: (1) a learning paradigm, where the relationship between movement of the joystick and cursor was reversed, requiring the learning of a visuomotor transformation to optimize performance and (2) a random paradigm, where the joystick/cursor relationship was changed randomly for each trial. Activation in the cerebellum was highest during the random paradigm and during the early stages of the learning paradigm. In the early stages of learning and during the random paradigm performance was poor with a decrease in the number of completed movements, and an increase in the time and length of movements. With repeated practice at the learning paradigm performance improbed and reached the same level of proficiency as in the standard task. Commensurate with the improbement in performance was a decrease in cerebellar activation, that is, activation in the cerebellum changed in a parallel, but inverse relationship with performance. Linear regression analysis demonstarated that the inverse correlation between cerebellar activation and motor performance was significant. Repeated practice at the random paradigm did not produce improvements in performance and cerebellar activity remained high. The data support the hypothesis that the cerebellum is strongly activated when motor performance is inaccurate, consistent with a role for the cerebellum in the detection of, and correction for visuomotor errors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.460040302

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imaging studies demonstrate strong cerebellar activation by motor errors, both task performance errors and sensory prediction errors.

    “Imaging studies also demonstrate strong cerebellar activation by motor errors, both task performance errors (Flament et al., 1996; Imamizu et al., 2000; Diedrichsen et al., 2005; Grafton et al., 2008) and sensory prediction errors (Schlerf et al., 2012).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Flament et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flament, D., Ellermann, J. M., Kim, S.-G., Uǧurbil, K., & Ebner, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Flament, Didier
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
210-226
ISSN
1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998779497
Cited by
140
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cerebellar activation, visuomotor transformation, motor skill learning, error correction, motor performance, practice effects, cerebellum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review