Cited by 169Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and Pedagogy

The impact of state physical education requirements on youth physical activity and overweight

Cawley, John, Meyerhoefer, Chad, Newhouse, David·2007·Health Economics

Abstract

To combat childhood overweight in the US, which has risen dramatically in the past three decades, many medical and public health organizations have called for students to spend more time in physical education (PE) classes. This paper is the first to examine the impact of state PE requirements on student PE exercise time. It also exploits variation in state laws as quasi-natural experiments in order to estimate the causal impact of PE on overall student physical activity and weight. We study nationwide data from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System for 1999, 2001, and 2003 merged with data on state minimum PE requirements from the 2001 Shape of the Nation Report. We find that high school students with a binding PE requirement report an average of 31 additional minutes per week spent physically active in PE class. Our results also indicate that additional PE time raises the number of days per week that girls report having exercised vigorously or having engaged in strength-building activity. We find no evidence that PE lowers BMI or the probability that a student is overweight. We conclude that raising PE credit requirements may make girls more physically active overall but there is not yet the scientific base to declare raising PE requirements an anti-obesity initiative for either boys or girls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.1218

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cawley, J., Meyerhoefer, C., & Newhouse, D.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
  • International Monetary Fund (US)
Corresponding author
Cawley, John
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-23
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1287-1301
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W2153338394
Cited by
169
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Heart Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
physical education requirements, state education policy, children's physical activity, childhood overweight, obesity prevention, high school students, sex differences in physical activity, high-intensity exercise, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Physical Education and Training, Regression Analysis, Schools, State Government, Students, United States, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Guidelines as Topic, Sex Distribution, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review