Cited by 138Technostress in Professional SettingsErgonomics and Human FactorsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

New technology, automation, and work organization: Stress problems and improved technology implementation strategies

Smith, Michael J., Carayon, Pascale·1995·International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing

Abstract

From the turn of the century to today there has been a revolution in the technology in use at the workplace. Coupled with this has been a major change in the way in which work is organized and managed. The integration of technology and how work is designed, organized, and managed have not always been smooth, as there has often been lags between the application of workplace automation and workplace design to accommodate the new technology and workforce needs. New theories of work organization and design to address automation and workforce issues have emphasized the need for more workforce involvement in the planning for automation and during the implementation of new technology, and for better workplace design to enhance human‐machine interfaces. Theories such as sociotechnical systems, macroergonomics, and high involvement management provide some insight into the problems of automation and solutions. The balance theory of Smith and Carayon‐Sainfort (1989) provides a framework for successful implementation of automation. @ 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hfm.4530050107

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EHRs are complex technological innovations that affect workflows, communication, job roles, working conditions, and job security.

    “Because EHRs are particularly complex technology innovations-affecting workflows, communications, job definitions, working conditions, and job security-demonstrat-ing and improving their safety is critically important.[5][6][7][8][9][10]”

    From EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems (2008) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. J., & Carayon, P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
99-116
ISSN
  • 1045-2699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-7111
OpenAlex
W2059956017
Cited by
138
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
workplace automation, work organization, technology implementation, occupational stress, human-machine interaction, workplace design, socio-technical systems, macroergonomics, high involvement management, workforce involvement, balance theory, technology implementation strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review