Cited by 94Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

The role of the direct perforant path input to the CA1 subregion of the dorsal hippocampus in memory retention and retrieval

Open access
Vago, David R., Bevan, Adam, Kesner, Raymond P.·2007·Hippocampus

Abstract

Subregional analyses of the hippocampus have suggested a selective role for the CA1 subregion in intermediate/long‐term spatial memory and consolidation, but not short‐term acquisition or encoding processes. It remains unclear how the direct cortical projection to CA1 via the perforant path (pp) contributes to these CA1‐dependent processes. It has been suggested that dopamine selectively modulates the pp projection to CA1 while having little to no effect on the Schaffer collateral (SC) projection to CA1. This series of behavioral and electrophysiological experiments takes advantage of this pharmacological dissociation to demonstrate that the direct pp inputs to CA1 are critical in CA1‐dependent intermediate‐term retention and retrieval function. Here we demonstrate that local infusion of the nonselective dopamine agonist, apomorphine (10, 15 μg), into the CA1 subregion of awake animals produces impairments in between‐day retention and retrieval, sparing within‐day encoding of a modified Hebb‐Williams maze and contextual conditioning of fear. In contrast, apomorphine produces no deficits when infused into the CA3 subregion. To complement the behavioral analyses, electrophysiological data was collected. In anesthetized animals, local infusion of the same doses of apomorphine significantly modifies evoked responses in the distal dendrites of CA1 following angular bundle stimulation, but produces no significant effects in the more proximal dendritic layer following stimulation of the SC. These results support a modulatory role for dopamine in the EC‐CA1, but not CA3‐CA1 circuitry, and suggest the possibility of a more fundamental role for EC‐CA1 synaptic transmission in terms of intermediate‐term, but not short‐term spatial memory. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20329

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vago, D. R., Bevan, A., & Kesner, R. P.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Kesner, Raymond P.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-29
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
977-987
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2069502544
Cited by
94
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
perforant path, CA1, dorsal hippocampus, dopamine, apomorphine, spatial memory, memory retention, memory retrieval, contextual fear conditioning, Hebb-Williams maze, Schaffer collaterals, CA3, entorhinal cortex, memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Animals, Apomorphine, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electric Stimulation, Fear, Hippocampus, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Time Factors, Dopamine Agonists, Maze Learning, Perforant Pathway, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review