Cited by 171Human Resource and Talent ManagementManagement and Organizational PracticesManagement Theory and Practice

Evolution of strategic HRM as seen through two founding books: A 30th anniversary perspective on development of the field

Kaufman, Bruce E.·2015·Human Resource Management

Abstract

Two pioneering books published in 1984 arguably launched the field of strategic human resource management (SHRM). The first is Strategic Human Resource Management by Fombrun, Tichy, and Devanna; the second is Managing Human Assets by Beer, Spector, Lawrence, Mills, and Walton. This article provides a 30th anniversary review of the two books, partly to honor their pioneering contributions but also to use them as a lens for examining how the field has subsequently evolved and developed. Two recently published SHRM books are used as a benchmark for this analysis. The review identifies areas of SHRM constancy and change, major theoretical and empirical innovations, and newly developed research questions and directions, largely in an American context. Diagrammatic models of SHRM are synthesized and compared from the four books; also, nine specific dimensions of evolution in the field are highlighted with discussion of advances and shortcomings. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.21720

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A developmental, humanist Soft HRM approach with a more comprehensive employee-stakeholder emphasis has gradually emerged since the 1980s.

    “Inspired by the Human Relations movement´s industrial-relations and employee-welfare approaches (Beer et al., 1984), a developmental, humanist Soft HRM approach (with a more comprehensive employee-stakeholder emphasis) has also gradually emerged since the 1980s (Kaufman, 2015).”

    From Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? (2020) · cites this paper as Kaufman, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufman, B. E.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kaufman, Bruce E.
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
389-407
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W1522764889
Cited by
171
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
strategic human resource management, history of HRM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review