CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Looking up and fitting in: Team leaders' and members' behaviors and attitudes toward the environment in an MNC

Open access
Baldassari, Paul, Eberhard, Sophie, Jiang, Yuan, Muller‐Camen, Michael, Obereder, Lisa, Schiffinger, Michael, Thiele, Raik·2023·Human Resource Management
DOI 10.1002/hrm.22163PMC PMC10946952
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As an emerging topic in human resource management (HRM) research, organizational citizenship behavior for the environment (OCBE) and workgroup green advocacy (WGGA) have been studied as a proxy of the environmental performance of organizations as well as a potential way for companies to assess the impact of their environmental strategies and initiatives. Viewing OCBE and WGGA as green‐focused knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics and building on leader‐member exchange theory, we examined the effects of leaders' OCBE and WGGA, person‐supervisor fit (PSF), and person‐group fit (PGF) as well as their potential interactions on members' OCBE and WGGA. To minimize the potential impact of different company strategies, the study was conducted in one MNC using a sample of 269 members from 64 teams. The results revealed that PSF and especially PGF were associated with members' OCBE and WGGA, but leaders' OCBE was a stronger predictor of members' OCBE and WGGA than leaders' WGGA. Contrary to our prediction, no moderating effect of PSF or PGF was found for the associations between leaders' and members' WGGA and OCBE. Together, these findings shed light on the differential trickle‐down effects of leaders' perceptions and behaviors in the context of environmental management. As for the implications for HRM practitioners, our findings suggest companies may focus on leaders' OCBE and WGGA as well as on PSF and PGF independently as the means to shaping team members' OCBE and WGGA to support environmental strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.22163

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baldassari et al. (2023) found that leaders' organizational citizenship behavior for the environment is a stronger predictor, compared to leaders' workplace green advocacy, of team members' organizational citizenship behavior for the environment and workplace green advocacy.

    “Specifically, Baldassari et al. (2023) offer a nuanced view that leaders' organizational citizenship behavior for the environment is a stronger predictor, compared to leaders' workplace green advocacy, of team members' organizational citizenship behavior for the environment and workplace green advocacy.”

    From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Baldassari et al. (2023)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932– 968. 10.1177/0149206311436079 · DOI
  2. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best‐practice recommendations for estimating cross‐level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490– 1528. 10.1177/0149206313478188 · DOI
  3. Andersson, L., Shivarajan, S., & Blau, G. (2005). Enacting ecological sustainability in the MNC: A test of an adapted value‐belief‐norm framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), 295– 305. 10.1007/s10551-005-3440-x · DOI
  4. Bandalos, D. L. (2021). Item meaning and order as causes of correlated residuals in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1–11, 903– 913. 10.1080/10705511.2021.1916395 · DOI
  5. Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154– 196). Guilford Publications.
  6. Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.
  7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers. 10.4324/9780203792643 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 221– 236. 10.1007/s10551-008-9881-2 · DOI
  9. Boiral, O., & Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 431– 445. 10.1007/s10551-011-1138-9 · DOI
  10. Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 671– 727. 10.5465/19416520.2016.1153261 · DOI
  11. Burns, W. E., & Ulrich, D. (2016). The evolving diversity agenda. Strategic HR Review, 15(5), 220– 225. 10.1108/SHR-08-2016-0065 · DOI
  12. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875– 884. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 12395812 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822– 834. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822 15506863 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader‐member exchange: A multi‐level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 487– 511. 10.1002/1099-1379(200008)21:5<487::AID-JOB57>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  15. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cojuharenco, I., Cornelissen, G., & Karelaia, N. (2016). Yes, I can: Feeling connected to others increases perceived effectiveness and socially responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 75– 86. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cooke, F. L., Xiao, M., & Chen, Y. (2021). Still in search of strategic human resource management? A review and suggestions for future research with China as an example. Human Resource Management, 60(1), 89– 118. 10.1002/hrm.22029 · DOI
  18. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874– 900. 10.1177/0149206305279602 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243– 256. 10.1177/0007650308315439 · DOI
  20. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46– 78. 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. de Cooman, R., Vantilborgh, T., Bal, M., & Lub, X. (2016). Creating inclusive teams through perceptions of supplementary and complementary person–team fit. Group & Organization Management, 41(3), 310– 342. 10.1177/1059601115586910 · DOI
  22. Devlieger, I., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Factor score path analysis. Methodology, 13(Supplement 1), 31– 38. 10.1027/1614-2241/a000130 · DOI
  23. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta‐analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader‐member exchange. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715– 1759. 10.1177/0149206311415280 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613– 627. 10.1002/hrm.21792 · DOI
  25. Eckardt, R., Crocker, A., & Tsai, C.‐Y. (2021). Clarifying and empirically assessing the concept of human capital resource emergence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 279– 306. 10.1080/09585192.2020.1800784 · DOI
  26. Edwards, M. R., & Kudret, S. (2017). Multi‐foci CSR perceptions, procedural justice and in‐role employee performance: The mediating role of commitment and pride. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 169– 188. 10.1111/1748-8583.12140 · DOI
  27. Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro‐environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1– 13. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017 · DOI
  28. Farzaneh, J., Farashah, A. D., & Kazemi, M. (2014). The impact of person‐job fit and person‐organization fit on OCB. Personnel Review, 43(5), 672– 691. 10.1108/PR-07-2013-0118 · DOI
  29. Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious? Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 485– 499. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007 16403654 · DOI
  30. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta‐analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827– 844.
  31. Gifford, R., & Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0004 · DOI
  32. Gkorezis, P. (2015). Supervisor support and pro‐environmental behavior: The mediating role of LMX. Management Decision, 53(5), 1045– 1060. 10.1108/MD-06-2014-0370 · DOI
  33. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161. 10.2307/2092623 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role‐making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers (pp. 143– 165). Kent State University Press.
  35. Graen, G., & Uhl‐Bien, M. (1995). Relationship‐based approach to leadership: Development of leader‐member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi‐level multi‐domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219– 247. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Graves, L. M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81– 91. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002 · DOI
  37. Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person‐environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self‐determination theory. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 465– 477. 10.1037/a0014068 19271801 · DOI
  38. Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517– 534. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hill, A. D., Johnson, S. G., Greco, L. M., O'Boyle, E. H., & Walter, S. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the Methodology‐practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105– 143. 10.1177/0149206320960533 · DOI
  40. Jackson, S. E., Renwick, D. W. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Müller‐Camen, M. (2011). State‐of‐the‐art and future directions for green human resource management. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(2), 99– 116. 10.1177/239700221102500203 · DOI · Paper page
  41. James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C.‐H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., & Kim, K. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 5– 32. 10.1080/13594320701662550 · DOI
  42. Jansen, K. J., & Kristof‐Brown, A. L. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person‐environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 193– 212.
  43. Jiang, Y., Jackson, S. E., Shim, H., Budhwar, P., Renwick, D. W. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B., Tang, G., Muller‐Camen, M., Wagner, M., & Kim, A. (2022). Culture as context: A five‐country study of discretionary green workplace behavior. Organization & Environment, 35(4), 499– 522. 10.1177/10860266221104039 · DOI
  44. Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E., & Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335– 1358. 10.1177/0149206314547386 · DOI
  45. Kim, J.‐S., & Frees, E. W. (2007). Multilevel modeling with correlated effects. Psychometrika, 72(4), 505– 533. 10.1007/s11336-007-9008-1 · DOI
  46. Kim, T. Y., & Kim, M. (2013). Leaders' moral competence and employee outcomes: The effects of psychological empowerment and person–supervisor fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 155– 166. 10.1007/s10551-012-1238-1 · DOI
  47. Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self‐report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359– 371. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003 · DOI
  48. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Li, C. S., & Schneider, B. (2018). Fitting In and doing good: A review of person‐environment fit and OCB research. In P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, N. P. Podsakoff, A. L. Kristof‐Brown, C. S. Li, & B. Schneider (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 353– 370). Oxford University Press.
  49. Liden, R. C., Anand, S., & Vidyarthi, P. (2016). Dyadic relationships. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 139– 166. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062452 · DOI
  50. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451– 465. 10.5465/255511 · DOI
  51. Liden, R. C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (1997). Leader‐member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 47– 119). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
  52. Logan, J. A. R., Jiang, H., Helsabeck, N., & Yeomans‐Maldonado, G. (2019). Should I allow my confirmatory factors to correlate during factor extraction? Implications for the Applied Researcher. 10.31219/osf.io/zcsnv · DOI
  53. Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl‐Bien, M. (2001). Leader‐member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self‐effort and other's effort on relationship quality. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697– 708. 10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.697 11519653 · DOI
  54. Mathieu, J. E., Gallagher, P. T., Domingo, M. A., & Klock, E. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17– 46. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106 · DOI
  55. Mathieu, M., Eschleman, K. J., & Cheng, D. (2019). Meta‐analytic and multiwave comparison of emotional support and instrumental support in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(3), 387– 409. 10.1037/ocp0000135 30335420 · DOI
  56. Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee green behavior. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103– 125. 10.1177/1086026615575773 · DOI
  57. Obereder, L., Müller‐Camen, M., & Renwick, D. W. S. (2022). GHRM in sustainability reporting: An exploratory analysis across six countries using the AMO framework. In P. Paillé (Ed.), Green human resource management research (pp. 141– 166). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-06558-3_7 · DOI
  58. Oh, I.‐S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J.‐H., Heo, C.‐G., & Shin, K.‐H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person‐environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 99– 152. 10.1111/peps.12026 · DOI
  59. Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444– 466. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01478.x · DOI
  60. Ostroff, C., & Schulte, M. (2007). Multiple perspectives of fit in organizations across levels of analysis. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  61. Paillé, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O., & Jin, J. (2014). The impact of human resource management on environmental performance: An employee‐level study. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 451– 466. 10.1007/s10551-013-1732-0 · DOI
  62. Paillé, P., Mejía‐Morelos, J. H., Amara, N., & Norrin, H. (2020). Greening the workplace through supervisory behaviors: Assessing what really matters to employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 37(2), 1– 28. 10.1080/09585192.2020.1819857 · DOI
  63. Park, J., Kim, H. J., & McCleary, K. W. (2014). The impact of top management's environmental attitudes on hotel companies' environmental management. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 38(1), 95– 115. 10.1177/1096348012452666 · DOI
  64. Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127– 150. 10.5465/amr.2009.0318 · DOI
  65. Ployhart, R. E., Nyberg, A. J., Reilly, G., & Maltarich, M. A. (2014). Human capital is dead; long live human capital resources! Journal of Management, 40(2), 371– 398. 10.1177/0149206313512152 · DOI
  66. Raineri, N., & Paillé, P. (2016). Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: The role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 129– 148. 10.1007/s10551-015-2548-x · DOI
  67. Ren, S., Jiang, K., & Tang, G. (2022). Leveraging green HRM for firm performance: The joint effects of CEO environmental belief and external pollution severity and the mediating role of employee environmental commitment. Human Resource Management, 61(1), 75– 90.
  68. Ren, S., Tang, G., & Kim, A. (2022). OCB‐E among Chinese employees of different contract types. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(3), 609– 628.
  69. Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1– 14. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · DOI · Paper page
  70. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau‐Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354– 373. 10.1037/a0029315 22799625 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698– 714. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 12184574 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro‐environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176– 194. 10.1002/job.1820 · DOI
  73. Robertson, J. L., & Carleton, E. (2018). Uncovering how and when environmental leadership affects employees' voluntary pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(2), 197– 210. 10.1177/1548051817738940 · DOI
  74. Rockstuhl, T., Eisenberger, R., Shore, L. M., Kurtessis, J. N., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., & Mesdaghinia, S. (2020). Perceived organizational support (POS) across 54 nations: A cross‐cultural meta‐analysis of POS effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(6), 933– 962.
  75. Sabokro, M., Masud, M. M., & Kayedian, A. (2021). The effect of green human resources management on corporate social responsibility, green psychological climate and employees' green behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127963. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127963 · DOI
  76. Seong, J. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2021). Multilevel homology and discontinuity of person‐group fit on individual and team creativity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1–18, 1– 18. 10.1080/00224545.2021.1967844 34590535 · DOI
  77. Shao, X., Jiang, Y., Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Does gender matter? The trickle‐down effect of voluntary green behavior in organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication, 61, 57– 78. 10.1111/1744-7941.12348 · DOI
  78. Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: Scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31– 55. 10.1111/1744-7941.12147 · DOI
  79. Tu, Y., Li, Y., & Zuo, W. (2023). Arousing employee pro‐environmental behavior: A synergy effect of environmentally specific transformational leadership and green human resource management. Human Resource Management, 1–21. 10.1002/hrm.22138 · DOI
  80. Wang, X., Xiao, H., Chen, K., & Niu, X. (2020). Why administrative leaders take pro‐environmental leadership actions: Evidence from an eco‐compensation programme in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(6), 385– 398.
  81. Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M. (2005). Aligning strategic human resource management and person–environment fit. Human Resource Management Review, 15(4), 247– 262. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477– 514. 10.1177/1094428110366036 · DOI
  83. Yaffe, T., & Kark, R. (2011). Leading by example: The case of leader OCB. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 806– 826. 10.1037/a0022464 21443315 · DOI
  84. Yu, A., Matta, F. K., & Cornfield, B. (2018). Is leader–member exchange differentiation beneficial or detrimental for group effectiveness? A meta‐analytic investigation and theoretical integration. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1158– 1188. 10.5465/amj.2016.1212 · DOI
  85. Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2018). Overcoming the barriers to pro‐environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 379– 394. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.041 · DOI
  86. Zhao, H., Zhou, Q., He, P., & Jiang, C. (2021). How and when does socially responsible HRM affect Employees' organizational citizenship behaviors toward the environment? Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 371– 385. 10.1007/s10551-019-04285-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldassari, P., Eberhard, S., Jiang, Y., Muller‐Camen, M., Obereder, L., Schiffinger, M., & Thiele, R.
Affiliations
  • Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
  • China Europe International Business School (CN)
  • Department of Management WU Vienna Vienna Austria
ORCID
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-18
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
267-282
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
DOI
10.1002/hrm.22163
PMC
PMC10946952
OpenAlex
W4317209518
Cited by
20
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Human Resource Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • WU Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CEIBS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (I 3342‐G16)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71932004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
organizational citizenship behavior for the environment, leader-member exchange, person-supervisor fit, person-group fit, trickle-down effect, team leaders, multinational corporations, environmental management, pro-environmental behavior, environmental performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review