The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of the mother's voice in developing mother's face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birth
Abstract
Four experiments are described which investigated the role of the mother's voice in facilitating recognition of the mother's face at birth. Experiment 1 replicated our previous findings (Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 1989; 7: 3–15; The origins of human face perception by very young infants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1990) indicating a preference for the mother's face when a control for the mother's voice and odours was used only during the testing. A second experiment adopted the same procedures, but controlled for the mother's voice from birth through testing. The neonates were at no time exposed to their mother's voice. Under these conditions, no preference was found. Further, neonates showed only few head turns towards both the mother and the stranger during the testing. Experiment 3 looked at the number of head turns under conditions where the newborn infants were exposed to both the mother's voice and face from birth to 5 to 15 min prior to testing. Again, a strong preference for the mother's face was demonstrated. Such preference, however, vanished in Experiment 4, when neonates had no previous exposure to the mother's voice–face combination. The conclusion drawn is that a prior experience with both the mother's voice and face is necessary for the development of face recognition, and that intermodal perception is evident at birth. The neonates' ability to recognize the face of the mother is most likely to be rooted in prenatal learning of the mother's voice. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7375928 · Cited by 2,317
Visual Following and Pattern Discrimination of Face-like Stimuli by Newborn Infants
Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.56.4.544 · Cited by 1,158
The Intermodal Representation of Speech in Infants
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80050-8 · Cited by 310
Intermodal exploration and knowledge in infancy
Spelke, E. S., & Owsley, C. J. (1979) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(79)80004-1 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?
McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002 · Cited by 443
Context modulates attention to social scenes in toddlers with autism
Chawarska, K., Macari, S., & Shic, F. (2012) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02538.x · Cited by 317
Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language
Kisilevsky, B. S., Hains, S. M. J., Brown, C. A., Lee, C. T., Cowperthwaite, B., Stutzman, S. S., Swansburg, M. L., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., et al. (2009) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.002 · Cited by 286
Sherman, L. J., Rice, K., & Cassidy, J. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.06.001 · Cited by 102
The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans
McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2009) · The Cognitive Neurosciences · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0042 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Sai, F. Z.
- Venue
- Infant and Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-50
- ISSN
- 1522-7219 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-7227
- OpenAlex
- W2041028925
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.